Improving district level health planning and priority setting in Tanzania through implementing accountability for reasonableness framework: Perceptions of stakeholders

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2006, researchers and decision-makers launched a five-year project - Response to Accountable Priority Setting for Trust in Health Systems (REACT) - to improve planning and priority-setting through implementing the Accountability for Reasonableness framework in Mbarali District, Tanzania. The objective of this paper is to explore the acceptability of Accountability for Reasonableness from the perspectives of the Council Health Management Team, local government officials, health workforce and members of user boards and committees.MethodsIndividual interviews were carried out with different categories of actors and stakeholders in the district. The interview guide consisted of a series of questions, asking respondents to describe their perceptions regarding each condition of the Accountability for Reasonableness framework in terms of priority setting. Interviews were analysed using thematic framework analysis. Documentary data were used to support, verify and highlight the key issues that emerged.ResultsAlmost all stakeholders viewed Accountability for Reasonableness as an important and feasible approach for improving priority-setting and health service delivery in their context. However, a few aspects of Accountability for Reasonableness were seen as too difficult to implement given the socio-political conditions and traditions in Tanzania. Respondents mentioned: budget ceilings and guidelines, low level of public awareness, unreliable and untimely funding, as well as the limited capacity of the district to generate local resources as the major contextual factors that hampered the full implementation of the framework in their context.ConclusionThis study was one of the first assessments of the applicability of Accountability for Reasonableness in health care priority-setting in Tanzania. The analysis, overall, suggests that the Accountability for Reasonableness framework could be an important tool for improving priority-setting processes in the contexts of resource-poor settings. However, the full implementation of Accountability for Reasonableness would require a proper capacity-building plan, involving all relevant stakeholders, particularly members of the community since public accountability is the ultimate aim, and it is the community that will live with the consequences of priority-setting decisions.

Understanding the local context and its possible influences on shaping, implementing and running social accountability initiatives for maternal health services in rural Democratic Republic of the Congo: a contextual factor analysis

“…Contextual factors such as described in the present study are more likely to be somewhat found at the local level in several low-and middle income countries, as reported in existing literature from Benin [23, 51], Burundi [48], Uganda [58], Tanzania [60] and India [26, 44]. This highlights that the conceptual model as adapted can be used in other setting in order to generate information about local contexts.…”

Pediatric Intensive Care in South Africa

“…In many ways, this process met the criteria of the accountability for reasonableness (25)(26)(27) process. In many ways, this process met the criteria of the accountability for reasonableness (25)(26)(27) process.…”

Emerging roles and competencies of district and sub-district pharmacists: a case study from Cape Town

“…The increase of pharmacy support workers and community health workers involved in medicine supply and distribution, as a result of task sharing and task shifting to mitigate shortages of pharmacists and improve access to essential medicines, reinforces the importance of the supervisory role [8]. In Tanzania, district pharmacists were involved in planning, budgeting, management and support of health services in the district [9]. However, in most countries, there is little specific information about district pharmacists’ responsibilities and how they function within the management team.…”