2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.30.015313
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving a probabilistic cytoarchitectonic atlas of auditory cortex using a novel method for inter-individual alignment

Abstract: The human superior temporal plane, the site of the auditory cortex, displays a high 15 inter-individual macro-anatomical variation. This questions the validity of curvature based 16 alignment (CBA) methods for in vivo imaging data. Here, we have addressed this issue by 17 developing CBA+, which is a cortical surface registration method that uses prior macro-anatomical 18 knowledge. We validate this method by using cyto-architectonic areas on ten individual brains 19 (which we make publicly available).… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is still unclear how microanatomy, and therefore functional specialization, relates to this macroanatomical variation. The macroanatomical alignment of an individual hemisphere to a microanatomical atlas of human auditory cortex is therefore problematic ( Gulban et al, 2020 ). Third, maps of only one acoustic feature, frequency, are reliably reproduced across research labs ( Ahveninen et al, 2016 ; Besle et al, 2019 ; Da Costa et al, 2011 ; Formisano et al, 2003 ; Moerel et al, 2012 ; Saenz and Langers, 2014 ; Striem-Amit et al, 2011 ; Woods et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Advancing Auditory Neuroscience Through Ultra-high Field Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still unclear how microanatomy, and therefore functional specialization, relates to this macroanatomical variation. The macroanatomical alignment of an individual hemisphere to a microanatomical atlas of human auditory cortex is therefore problematic ( Gulban et al, 2020 ). Third, maps of only one acoustic feature, frequency, are reliably reproduced across research labs ( Ahveninen et al, 2016 ; Besle et al, 2019 ; Da Costa et al, 2011 ; Formisano et al, 2003 ; Moerel et al, 2012 ; Saenz and Langers, 2014 ; Striem-Amit et al, 2011 ; Woods et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Advancing Auditory Neuroscience Through Ultra-high Field Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect that this has on sampling the laminar activation profiles in auditory regions whose cytoarchitecture overlaps only partly with macro-anatomical features (see e.g. Gulban et al, 2020) is beyond the scope of this paper but could be an interesting venue for future investigations. What we did observe was that while the signal in the upper layers has the tendency to be larger than in middle and deeper layers, the signal decreases again at the pial surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te3 lies on the lateral surface of the superior temporal gyrus, is an auditory association area, part of BA 22 and might correspond to parabelt areas in primates [67]. However, functional differences between human auditory fields and their correspondence to primates' auditory fields are still unclear; e.g., [67][68][69].…”
Section: Anatomical Roismentioning
confidence: 99%