2006
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.045781
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Improvement of Mapping Accuracy by Unifying Linkage and Association Analysis

Abstract: It is well known that pedigree/family data record information on the coexistence in founder haplotypes of alleles at nearby loci and the cotransmission from parent to offspring that reveal different, but complementary, profiles of the genetic architecture. Either conventional linkage analysis that assumes linkage equilibrium or family-based association tests (FBATs) capture only partial information, leading to inefficiency. For example, FBATs will fail to detect even very tight linkage in the case where no all… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5
4
3
0

Citation Types

1
12
0
0

Year Published

Range
2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 10 publications

(13 citation statements)
references

References 50 publications

1
12
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We demonstrated by simulations that a JLA analysis based on MOD scores can substantially increase power as compared to the corresponding linkage-only test (Table 5). This observation was in accordance with the statement mentioned earlier, saying that a JLA analysis can substantially increase mapping accuracy and power because it makes use of both family and population information [4,5]. Moreover, we showed that there are LD scenarios, for which either the 2-or 3-marker JLA tests can be more powerful than the corresponding singlemarker test, which confirms another statement mentioned earlier, saying that haplotype-based association methods can outperform single-marker analyses [71], especially when the LD between the investigated test markers and the trait locus is rather weak [73].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although these implementations offer the ability to include association information into the calculations, formal joint tests for linkage and association are less common. A parametric, likelihood-based approach to JLA analysis was presented by Lou et al [5,65], who also pointed out that neglecting association information can lead to a loss in statistical power of the linkage test and to biased estimates of the recombination fraction. Another JLA approach, implemented in the PSEUDOMARKER software package, exploits the equivalence of parametric and nonparametric linkage methods and offers various likelihood ratio tests with different null and alternative hypotheses including a JLA test for single markers using twopoint calculations [4,63,64].…”
Section: Joint Linkage and Association (Jla) Analysis
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation