2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3268-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of lipid profile after switching from efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to rilpivirine or once-daily integrase inhibitors: results from a large observational cohort study (SCOLTA)

Abstract: BackgroundDyslipidemia represents a significant non-infectious comorbidity among people living with HIV. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact on lipid profile of switches from an efavirenz (EFV) or protease inhibitor/ritonavir (PI/r)-based regimen to a rilpivirine (RPV) or a once-daily integrase inhibitor-based regimen.MethodsWe analyzed data from SCOLTA prospective database. All patients with HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml in therapy with two NRTI + EFV or PI/r were included if they switched from EFV to do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some mild-to-moderate biochemical abnormalities have been pinpointed as RPV-related adverse hepatic events, these alterations are soon normalised 20. Overall, clinical evidence supports the use of RPV in lifelong treatments, with some recent reports even suggesting its beneficial effects on several clinical parameters after switching from other non-RPV-containing regimens 21 22. However, its particular contribution to liver disease progression and its actions on different cell subpopulations under varying pathological hepatic conditions were unknown previously to the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although some mild-to-moderate biochemical abnormalities have been pinpointed as RPV-related adverse hepatic events, these alterations are soon normalised 20. Overall, clinical evidence supports the use of RPV in lifelong treatments, with some recent reports even suggesting its beneficial effects on several clinical parameters after switching from other non-RPV-containing regimens 21 22. However, its particular contribution to liver disease progression and its actions on different cell subpopulations under varying pathological hepatic conditions were unknown previously to the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Its use is recommended to be limited to patients with pre-treatment CD4 counts exceeding 200 cells/mm 3 [2,3]. RPV has fewer reported neurologic and psychiatric adverse effects compared with efavirenz (EFV) [7], and a more favourable metabolic profile compared with protease inhibitors, making it an attractive third drug in combination with NRTIs [8]. The combination of ABC/3TC plus RPV is a once-daily regimen with low pill burden [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a previous study, the switch from ritonavir to cobicistat was followed by a significant reduction in TC, LDL, but also of HDL, and TG levels in patients with HC [14]. In our prospective observation, despite most patients were switching from ritonavir boosted PI to DRV/c, we did not observe significant change in lipids, even in the sub-analysis focused on patients with higher baseline triglycerides and cholesterol levels, which were those expected to experience the greatest lipid changes [14, 21]. These results were consistent with previous studies including a large proportion of patients on ritonavir-boosted PI regimens who switched to DRV/c [12, 16], although lipid changes could have been partially confounded by the presence or removal of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) from the regimen after the switch, with consequent lost of its lipid lowering effect [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%