2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb15514.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Fish‐sauce Odor by Treatment with Bacteria Isolated from the Fish‐sauce Mush (Moromi) Made from Frigate Mackerel

Abstract: ABSTRA ABSTRA ABSTRA ABSTRA ABSTRACT CT CT CT CT: A bacter : A bacter : A bacter : A bacter : A bacterium, which was isolated fr ium, which was isolated fr ium, which was isolated fr ium, which was isolated fr ium, which was isolated from fish-sauce mush (mor om fish-sauce mush (mor om fish-sauce mush (mor om fish-sauce mush (mor om fish-sauce mush (moromi) of fr omi) of fr omi) of fr omi) of fr omi) of frigate macker igate macker igate macker igate macker igate mackerel and identified el and identified el and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to their different physicochemical properties and generation pathways, three types of deodorization methods are commonly used: i) physical methods, which include adsorption (Kim et al, 2003) or extraction, masking (Serfert et al, 2010) and microcapsules (Kwak et al, 2003) are easy to perform because of their large output, low cost, simple operation and easy industrialization; ii) chemical methods, which include the Maillard reaction (Varlet et al, 2007), antioxidation and ozonation (Koch et al, 1992) are more effective than physical methods, but the chemical reaction alters the components; and iii) biological methods, primarily fermentation, although the mechanism is unclear, (Cho et al, 1991(Cho et al, , 2000Shinabe et al, 1995) and endogenous bacteria can also produce odor in aquatic products (Fukami et al, 2004b(Fukami et al, , 2004a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their different physicochemical properties and generation pathways, three types of deodorization methods are commonly used: i) physical methods, which include adsorption (Kim et al, 2003) or extraction, masking (Serfert et al, 2010) and microcapsules (Kwak et al, 2003) are easy to perform because of their large output, low cost, simple operation and easy industrialization; ii) chemical methods, which include the Maillard reaction (Varlet et al, 2007), antioxidation and ozonation (Koch et al, 1992) are more effective than physical methods, but the chemical reaction alters the components; and iii) biological methods, primarily fermentation, although the mechanism is unclear, (Cho et al, 1991(Cho et al, , 2000Shinabe et al, 1995) and endogenous bacteria can also produce odor in aquatic products (Fukami et al, 2004b(Fukami et al, , 2004a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, halophilic LAB, the dominant LAB have been widely used as industrial starter to improve the quality or shorten the ripeness periods (Ogasawara et al, 2006). Among halophilic LAB, the genus Tetragenococcus was found in many fermented foods such as soy sauce, fish sauce, shrimp, and fermented black beans (Chen et al, 2006;Fukami et al, 2004;Udomsil et al, 2011) and it comprised five species: T. halophilus, T. muriaticus, T. solitaries, T. koreensis and T .osmophilus (Justé et al, 2008). The bacteria species could grow in 18% NaCl or greater, and produced numerous volatile compounds (Udomsil et al, 2011;Udomsil et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bacterium, identified as Staphylococcus xylosus, could change notes of an odor in fish sauce made in Thailand (Fukami et al, 2004). As a result of sensory evaluation, fishy, sweaty and fecal notes of the fish sauce treated with the bacterium were all weaker than those of the untreated fish sauce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%