2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)
DOI: 10.1109/pes.2003.1267455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement in the performance of on-load tap changer transformers operating in series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinction between those two cases can be found by monitoring the local voltage and current at the DG point, as well as the upstream feeder impedance. This information could provide us a simulated voltage drop, from which we are able to determine whether any load change has occurred in the voltage control zone of the DG [15]. If the difference between simulated voltage drop before and after voltage excursion is large, then the second cause is more likely to occur.…”
Section: B Design Of Controller For Dg Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between those two cases can be found by monitoring the local voltage and current at the DG point, as well as the upstream feeder impedance. This information could provide us a simulated voltage drop, from which we are able to determine whether any load change has occurred in the voltage control zone of the DG [15]. If the difference between simulated voltage drop before and after voltage excursion is large, then the second cause is more likely to occur.…”
Section: B Design Of Controller For Dg Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the remote voltage is outside the deadband, this is due to one or both of the following reasons: -A voltage change upstream the DG -A load change downstream the DG The distinction between those two can be found by monitoring the local voltage and current at DG point, as well as the upstream feeder impedance. This information could provide us a simulated voltage drop, from which we are able to define if there is any load change has occurred in the voltage control zone of the DG [8]. If the difference between simulated voltage drop before and after voltage excursion is large, then the second cause is more likely to occur.…”
Section: Coordinated Voltage Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One type of adverse interaction is device hunting which we define as one or more devices actuating in a repeated sequence that results in periodic voltage oscillations. Hunting among LTCs has been observed by utilities since the 1980s [4], [5] and has been modeled as a hybrid system in the literature [5]. Inverter-based DERs may be able to solve these problems if their control parameters are set appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%