2002
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved survival in both histologic types of oesophageal cancer in Sweden

Abstract: The prognosis among patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer is poor with an overall 5-year survival close to 5% in most countries. Improved diagnostic and surgical strategies might influence the survival, however. We investigated the observed and relative survival among all patients in Sweden diagnosed with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (n ‫؍‬ 1,441) or squamous cell carcinoma (n ‫؍‬ 6395) from 1961-1996 with follow-up to December 1997. Observed survival rates were calculated by the life-table method. Relative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing survival among the entire Swedish population in the same age, sex, and calendar year strata, they verified that 5-year survival rate and 5-year relative survival rate for ACE increased from a stable figure close to 4% and 5% during 1961-1989, respectively, to 10.5% and 13.7% during 1990-1996, respectively [32]. In a more recent study, Polednak et al [33], using a computer program that included mortality rates for the general population and relative survival rates for patients with ACE and SCC, verified an increase in relative survival rates for ACE and esophageal SCC, and for both males and females from 1975-1979 to 1995-1998, 3-year relative survival rates increased from 10.3% to 20.7% in males, and from 6.6% to 18.6% in females for ACE.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Comparing survival among the entire Swedish population in the same age, sex, and calendar year strata, they verified that 5-year survival rate and 5-year relative survival rate for ACE increased from a stable figure close to 4% and 5% during 1961-1989, respectively, to 10.5% and 13.7% during 1990-1996, respectively [32]. In a more recent study, Polednak et al [33], using a computer program that included mortality rates for the general population and relative survival rates for patients with ACE and SCC, verified an increase in relative survival rates for ACE and esophageal SCC, and for both males and females from 1975-1979 to 1995-1998, 3-year relative survival rates increased from 10.3% to 20.7% in males, and from 6.6% to 18.6% in females for ACE.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The choice of follow-up times was based on the knowledge that acute problems would have abated 6 months after surgery, the risk of recurrent disease would be low 7,15 and the chance of cure would be high after 3 years 16 . Local tumour recurrence may influence weight loss, particularly as a result of dysphagia, so to avoid this problem the study was restricted to patients who had clear resection margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Oesophageal cancer trends are also influenced by improvements in diagnosis and disease management. Although the prognosis of oesophageal cancer has been poor-with a relative survival of between 5 and 10% up to the 1980s-some recent data showed the existence of appreciable improvements for both histologic types of oesophageal cancer over the last decades, [34][35][36][37][38] probably as a consequence of earlier diagnosis and detection through wider adoption of endoscopy, as well as to advancements in treatment of the disease. The impact of such improvements on oesophageal cancer mortality is, however, difficult to evaluate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%