2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010gl045523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved surface-wave retrieval from ambient seismic noise by multi-dimensional deconvolution

Abstract: The methodology of surface‐wave retrieval from ambient seismic noise by crosscorrelation relies on the assumption that the noise field is equipartitioned. Deviations from equipartitioning degrade the accuracy of the retrieved surface‐wave Green's function. A point‐spread function, derived from the same ambient noise field, quantifies the smearing in space and time of the virtual source of the Green's function. By multidimensionally deconvolving the retrieved Green's function by the point‐spread function, the v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they found that SI by MDD slightly corrects the phase of the retrieved responses at short offsets, resulting in more accurate phase-velocity estimates. The improvements found corroborate earlier numerical experiments considering a subset of USAarray stations illuminated by fundamental-mode surface wave noise excited along the eastern coast of the USA (Wapenaar et al 2011a).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, they found that SI by MDD slightly corrects the phase of the retrieved responses at short offsets, resulting in more accurate phase-velocity estimates. The improvements found corroborate earlier numerical experiments considering a subset of USAarray stations illuminated by fundamental-mode surface wave noise excited along the eastern coast of the USA (Wapenaar et al 2011a).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The array has an aperture of approximately 60 km and has partly been designed for the application of SI by MDD (Ruigrok et al 2012). The denser receiver spacing of this array with respect to the deployments considered in Wapenaar et al (2011a) and van Dalen et al (2015), allows application of SI by MDD over a larger frequency range. The T-shape of the array lends itself well for the application of SI by MDD: it allows the construction of a PSF along one of the two receiver lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the CC method, the MDD method is valid for a dissipative medium and compensates for differences in source spectra, and it is also valid for irregular source distributions. Due to these advantages, the MDD method has shown to be superior in some cases, such as in the retrieval of surface waves (Wapenaar et al, 2011a), in electromagnetic surveys (Wapenaar et al, 2008), in use with VSs (van der Neut et al, 2011), and in crosswell seismic data (Minato et al, 2011). On the other hand, MDD has several disadvantages compared to the CC method; MDD requires receiver arrays and cannot be applied to a single receiver configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of seismic interferometry theory (e.g. Wapenaar, 2003Wapenaar, , 2004Campillo and Paul, 2003;van-Manen et al, 2005van-Manen et al, , 2006van-Manen et al, , 2007Wapenaar and Fokkema, 2006;Slob et al, 2007;Curtis et al, 2009;Curtis and Halliday, 2010a,b;Wapenaar et al, 2011) allowed us to decode the information contained in the ambient noise wavefield to create a useful signal, in fact an artificial seismogram, from what used to be called noise. This new seismogram can then be used to image the subsurface of the Earth using traditional seismological tomographic or imaging methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%