1997
DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.19.3925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Single-Strand DNA Sizing Accuracy in Capillary Electrophoresis

Abstract: Interpolation algorithms can be developed to size unknown single-stranded (ss) DNA fragments based on their electrophoretic mobilities, when they are compared with the mobilities of standard fragments of known sizes; however, sequence-specific anomalous electrophoretic migration can affect the accuracy and precision of the called sizes of the fragments. We used the anomalous migration of ssDNA fragments to optimize denaturation conditions for capillary electrophoresis. The capillary electrophoretic system uses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(i) Discrepancies between in silico and experimental T-RF sizes, i.e., 1.6 Ϯ 1.5 units in this study, may reduce specific inference of particular T-RFs in complex profiles (30,52). Migration discrepancies for different T-RF sequences with the same length led to differences between in silico and experimental T-RFLP profiles (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…(i) Discrepancies between in silico and experimental T-RF sizes, i.e., 1.6 Ϯ 1.5 units in this study, may reduce specific inference of particular T-RFs in complex profiles (30,52). Migration discrepancies for different T-RF sequences with the same length led to differences between in silico and experimental T-RFLP profiles (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In CE, amplicons were found to migrate faster than predicted, and the results show a lower number of repeats in one or two peaks [29][30][31] . Factors contributing to these discrepancies could be the different sieving effects of cross-linked PAGE compared with the linear polymer used in CE, the electroosmotic effect, the extent of denaturation or differences in secondary structure between amplicons and standard markers 32 . Considering the previous studies regarding differences between PAGE with CE, we did not compare these two methodologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplicon length was calculated by comparison with the GeneScan 500-TAMRA size standard using the GeneScan Analysis 3.1.2 software. Size standard fragments 250 bp and 340 bp were not considered for size estimation purposes due to their anomalous migration (Rosenblum et al 1997). A size correction formula [(CE product size (bp) -198)/3 9 1.0184 + 0.7062; adapted from Dorschner et al 2002] was applied to allow the comparison with data from previous works, where manual polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) assay was used instead of CE.…”
Section: Allele Size Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%