2017
DOI: 10.1080/07038992.2017.1356220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Prediction of Forest Variables Using Data Assimilation of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where x i is the SAR variable (γ Vol ; γ 0 ) and y i the forest parameter to be predicted for the plot i, α is the intercept (bias), β is the slope, and ε i is the error term of the linear regression for that plot. A linear relation between the SAR variables and forest parameters was observed e.g., by [45,46], and other studies. Since it requires a linear scaling of the input variables the gamma naught data were not logarithmically scaled to dB values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where x i is the SAR variable (γ Vol ; γ 0 ) and y i the forest parameter to be predicted for the plot i, α is the intercept (bias), β is the slope, and ε i is the error term of the linear regression for that plot. A linear relation between the SAR variables and forest parameters was observed e.g., by [45,46], and other studies. Since it requires a linear scaling of the input variables the gamma naught data were not logarithmically scaled to dB values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Best results in terms of model significance were achieved with a height of ambiguity that is considerably above the top tree height (65.8 m). If the height of ambiguity is in the range of the top tree height, the phase cannot be unwrapped without ambiguity [57], on the other hand, very small baselines and higher height of ambiguity lead to limitations in sensitivity of the phase to forest vertical structure [45,58,59]. Thus, the optimal height of ambiguity for forest vertical structure assessment from X-band InSAR data is above the maximum stand height and should not exceed 100 m [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISH was normalized with a digital elevation model obtained from ALS. Both the normalized ISH and COH have been shown to have a strong correlation with forest attributes in previous studies [7,24,25], and thus both these characteristics were extracted for the field plots with the same procedure as for the SPOT-data.…”
Section: Tandem-x Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying recent developments in forestry applications of DA, promising results have been obtained in simulation studies [5]. However, the empirical results presented by [6,7] pointed out problems to fully realize the theoretical potential of DA in practice. In the latter studies, making use of only the last measurement for estimating the current state of key forest characteristics was sometimes almost as good as making use of the entire time series through DA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation