1996
Improved Nasal Breathing Reduces Snoring and Morning Tiredness: A 6-Month Follow-up Study
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
29
0
0
0
Citation Types
0
10
0
2
Year Published
1998
2023
Publication Types
Select...
29
Relationship
0
29
Authors
Journals
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
References 9 publications
0
10
0
2
“…Although external and internal nasal dilators seem noninvasive and easy to use, in a 6-month follow-up study, patient compliance with internal nasal dilators was only 60%. 8 This compliance rate decreased to 21% in a 5-year follow-up study. 23 Additionally, there are a number of other disadvantages to the use of nasal dilators, including allergic reactions and foreign body sensation.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although external and internal nasal dilators seem noninvasive and easy to use, in a 6-month follow-up study, patient compliance with internal nasal dilators was only 60%. 8 This compliance rate decreased to 21% in a 5-year follow-up study. 23 Additionally, there are a number of other disadvantages to the use of nasal dilators, including allergic reactions and foreign body sensation.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…15 Compliance with nasal dilators was approximately 60% at 6 months in Löth's study driven by a reported lack of benefit, poor fit, or discomfort. 23 At 5 years, compliance in the same patient population dropped to 21%. 24 These devices are often sold in a few specific sizes which may contribute to the high incidence of discomfort and variable outcomes among various nasofacial profiles.…”
Section: Limitations Of Nasal Appliancesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An internal nasal dilator significantly reduced snoring in men [23] and was as effective as a local decongestant in healthy subjects [24]. An external nasal dilator improved subjective nasal breathing in 24 patients with 'pregnancy-related nocturnal nasal congestion' [25].…”
Section: Physiologic Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
