2006
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200649215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Naive Bayesian Modeling of Numerical Data for Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion (ADME) Property Prediction.

Abstract: ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract, please click on HTML or PDF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laplacian-corrected Bayesian classifier models were generated using Discovery Studio (version 3.0; Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA) [19][20][21] . Bayesian categorization model is a statistical classification method, which use knowledge of probability and statistics based on Bayes' theorem (Eq 1):…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laplacian-corrected Bayesian classifier models were generated using Discovery Studio (version 3.0; Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA) [19][20][21] . Bayesian categorization model is a statistical classification method, which use knowledge of probability and statistics based on Bayes' theorem (Eq 1):…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laplacian-corrected Bayesian classifier models were generated using Discovery Studio (version 2.5.5; Accelrys, San Diego, CA). This approach uses a machine learning method with two-dimensional descriptors [as described previously for other applications (Rogers et al, 2005;Hassan et al, 2006;Klon et al, 2006;Bender et al, 2007;Prathipati et al, 2008)] to distinguish between compounds that are DILI-positive and those that are DILI-negative. Preliminary work evaluated separately different functional class fingerprint (FCFP) (of size 0 -20) descriptors alongside interpretable descriptors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, computational models have been applied in the area of drug development such as studies modeling thermodynamic proxies , drug solubility simulation in human intestinal fluid (Fagerberg et al 2015), stability prediction in mouse liver microsomes (Perryman et al 2016), auto-oxidation predictions (Lienard et al 2015), sites of CYP2C9 metabolism prediction (Kingsley et al 2015), human skin permeability prediction (Baba et al 2015), blood-brain barrier penetration , and estimates of skin concentration levels after dermal exposure (Hatanaka et al 2015). Additionally, the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADME/Tox) properties of molecules have been modeled by applying a variety of machine learning algorithms such as Bayesian modeling, (Klon et al 2006), Gaussian processes (Obrezanova et al 2007), and support vector machines (Zheng et al 2009). Predicting interactions with drug metabolizing enzymes such as CYP450s and transporters as well as predicting other ADME/Tox properties have been made possible by applying computational machine learning models and those studies have produced an increasing amounts of large data through the extensive use of combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening (Clark et al 2015).…”
Section: Drug Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%