2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Abstract: Breast cancer death rates are higher than any other cancer in American women. Machine learning-based predictive models promise earlier detection techniques for breast cancer diagnosis. However, making an evaluation for models that efficiently diagnose cancer is still challenging. In this work, we proposed data exploratory techniques (DET) and developed four different predictive models to improve breast cancer diagnostic accuracy. Prior to models, four-layered essential DET, e.g., feature distribution, correlat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rasool et al [31] developed a model with RFE for the same Coimbra breast dataset. They applied the hold-out validation (80% for training and 20% for testing) method and achieved the highest accuracy up to 76.42% for the polynomial SVM classifier.…”
Section: Study Comparison With Earlier Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rasool et al [31] developed a model with RFE for the same Coimbra breast dataset. They applied the hold-out validation (80% for training and 20% for testing) method and achieved the highest accuracy up to 76.42% for the polynomial SVM classifier.…”
Section: Study Comparison With Earlier Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They ( 17 ) constructed four distinct predictive models and offered data exploratory techniques (DET) to increase breast cancer detection accuracy in this study. Prior to the models, researchers dug deep into four-layered critical DET, such as feature distribution, correlation, removal, and hyperparameter optimization, to find the most robust feature categorization into malignant and benign classifications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these traditional breast cancer detection techniques suffer from various setbacks. For instance, biopsy techniques prove to be painful to patients [14] , while mammogram suffers from noise and is not reliable for detection of breast cancer. As discussed by Moloney et al [24] , mammography to digital breast cancer exploit attenuation of X-rays as they pass through breast tissue and it remains a good standard investigation of symptomatic women aged 40 years.…”
Section: Conventional Breast Cancer Diagnosis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The malignant tumor may begin in the cells of the breast, which then spreads to the surrounding tissues [11][12][13] . As explained by Rasool et al [14] , normal cells in the breast and other parts of the body grow and divide to form new cells as they are needed. When these normal cells grow old and get damaged, they die and new cells take their place [15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%