2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.04721
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved local models and new Bell inequalities via Frank-Wolfe algorithms

Abstract: ∞ 1979 Lower bounds 0.5 Werner [4] ∞ 1989 Table I. Successive refinements of the bounds on v Wer c , the nonlocality threshold of the two-qubit Werner states under projective measurements. Using m measurements to simulate all projective ones is denoted by m ∼ ∞.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us now recall the Grothendieck constant of order 3 22 , 25 , 26 , 32 , 33 , which is given by where the maximization is taken over real matrices M of arbitrary dimensions , q ( M ) is defined by ( 8 ) and L ( M ) is defined as follows where the maximum is taken over all . The value of in ( 16 ), according to the recent work of Designolle et al 34 , is bounded by where the lower bound is an improved version of that given in Ref. 35 and the upper bound is an improved version of that given in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us now recall the Grothendieck constant of order 3 22 , 25 , 26 , 32 , 33 , which is given by where the maximization is taken over real matrices M of arbitrary dimensions , q ( M ) is defined by ( 8 ) and L ( M ) is defined as follows where the maximum is taken over all . The value of in ( 16 ), according to the recent work of Designolle et al 34 , is bounded by where the lower bound is an improved version of that given in Ref. 35 and the upper bound is an improved version of that given in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%