2010
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201001452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Film Morphology Reduces Charge Carrier Recombination into the Triplet Excited State in a Small Bandgap Polymer‐Fullerene Photovoltaic Cell

Abstract: The use of diiodooctane as processing additive for construction of PCPDTBT:PCBM solar cells results in a profound change in photophysical behavior of this blend. In the improved morphology obtained with the additive, recombination of charge carriers to the lowest triplet excited state is suppressed. This contributes to the boost in solar power conversion efficiency induced by the use of the processing agent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
185
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
19
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results confi rm that CT dissociation is favored by donor-acceptor nanomorphologies with separated and ordered phases. [ 24,25 ] Large and ordered domains can be expected to result in enhanced delocalization of the electron and hole wave functions, which would in turn reduce the effective binding energy of the CT pairs. [ 48 ] Moreover, Si-PCPDTBT:PCBM blends exhibit less geminate recombination to the ground state and to the triplet state of the polymer compared to C-PCPDTBT:PCBM, [ 49 ] supporting the idea of enhanced CT dissociation effi ciency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results confi rm that CT dissociation is favored by donor-acceptor nanomorphologies with separated and ordered phases. [ 24,25 ] Large and ordered domains can be expected to result in enhanced delocalization of the electron and hole wave functions, which would in turn reduce the effective binding energy of the CT pairs. [ 48 ] Moreover, Si-PCPDTBT:PCBM blends exhibit less geminate recombination to the ground state and to the triplet state of the polymer compared to C-PCPDTBT:PCBM, [ 49 ] supporting the idea of enhanced CT dissociation effi ciency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that the nanoscale morphology of the blends plays a role in the kinetics of charge separation and recombination. [24][25][26] In intimately, almost molecularly mixed, donor-acceptor blends charges have higher chance of recombining. In contrast, the presence of nanocrystalline fullerene domains has been found to enhance the dissociation of charge transfer states into free charge carriers.…”
Section: Wileyonlinelibrarycommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20,24 However, when charge transfer and the subsequent dissociation of CT states into free charge carriers is faster than intersystem crossing, this does not constitute a major loss mechanism. 23 The intensity borrowing mechanism proposed in this paper should be considered as another possible loss mechanism limiting the photocurrent for small "driving force" polymer:fullerene systems. This loss mechanism, however, can be reduced by reducing the electronic coupling matrix element V * by, for example, increasing the distance between donor and acceptor molecule.…”
Section: Implications For Polymer:fullerene Photovoltaics and Concmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…14,22 For example, for such low driving force material systems, triplet energies of polymer and/or fullerene can be below the CT state, sparking debate as to whether population of the triplet state in such systems constitutes a fundamental loss. [23][24][25] Another topic of intense debate relates to the excess energy from excited donor states and if it is exploited as kinetic energy to increase the intercharge pair separation distance, improving the free charge carrier generation rate. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Therefore, theoretical and experimental investigations of the electronic structure of the CT state, focusing on the influence of the E D * − E CT difference, are of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%