2001
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Detection of Event-Related Functional MRI Signals Using Probability Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The event train for the event-related part was generated with interstimulus intervals (ISIs) taken from a uniform permuted distribution between 6 Â TR = 2.64 seconds and 26 Â TR = 11.44 seconds in 1 Â TR steps (Burock et al, 1998;Hagberg et al, 2001). In total, 61 stimuli were presented with a stimulus duration of 250 ms (two 125 ms opposing checkerboard frames) and a mean ISI of 7.04 seconds.…”
Section: Functional Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The event train for the event-related part was generated with interstimulus intervals (ISIs) taken from a uniform permuted distribution between 6 Â TR = 2.64 seconds and 26 Â TR = 11.44 seconds in 1 Â TR steps (Burock et al, 1998;Hagberg et al, 2001). In total, 61 stimuli were presented with a stimulus duration of 250 ms (two 125 ms opposing checkerboard frames) and a mean ISI of 7.04 seconds.…”
Section: Functional Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average TOA was thus 5850 msec. The eight TOA values were pseudorandomized across our trial list using a Latin Squares procedure (see Hagberg, Zito, Patria, & Sanes, 2001), such that the first eight trials had a random ordering of the eight TOA values, the next eight trials had a different random ordering, and so forth.…”
Section: Image Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first paradigm, the two conditions were distributed at ISI of 3, 6, and 9 sec using a uniform distribution, which has been shown in simulations to provide high response estimation efficiency [Hagberg et al, 2001]. In rapid ER experiments, three or more inter-stimulus intervals are used to provide sufficient simultaneous equations for estimating the hemodynamic response without making prior assumptions about its shape [Josephs et al, 1997;Miezin et al, 2000;Ollinger et al, 2001a].…”
Section: Simulated Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of differences in response magnitude is important in uncovering the functional anatomy of cognitive processes such as priming and subsequent memory Wagner et al, 1998]. Specifically, the ability to detect subtle signal differences in as short an experiment as possible is a desirable goal and has been the subject of several methodological studies to date [Burock and Dale, 2000;Dale, 1999;Friston et al, 1999;Hagberg et al, 2001;Vazquez and Noll, 1998]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%