2015
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved analysis‐error covariance matrix for high‐dimensional variational inversions: application to source estimation using a 3D atmospheric transport model

Abstract: Variational methods are widely used to solve geophysical inverse problems. Although gradient-based minimization algorithms are available for high-dimensional problems (dimension > 10 6 ), they do not provide an estimate of the errors in the optimal solution. In this study, we assess the performance of several numerical methods to approximate the analysis-error covariance matrix, assuming reasonably linear models. The evaluation is performed for a CO 2 flux estimation problem using synthetic remote-sensing obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A drawback is that error characterization is not included as part of the solution. Approximate methods are available at additional computational cost to estimate the posterior error covariance matrixŜ and from there the averaging kernel matrix A (Bousserez et al, 2015).…”
Section: Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A drawback is that error characterization is not included as part of the solution. Approximate methods are available at additional computational cost to estimate the posterior error covariance matrixŜ and from there the averaging kernel matrix A (Bousserez et al, 2015).…”
Section: Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the prior estimate (x A , S A ) informed by the current observing system without the proposed instrument, we can quantify the information added by the proposed instrument by computingŜ from Eq. (9) or an adjoint-based approximation (Bousserez et al, 2015). From there we obtain the averaging kernel matrix A = I n −ŜS −1 A and the DOFS, and compare to the DOFS without the instrument to quantify the information to be gained.…”
Section: Mcmc Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, following Bousserez et al (2015), the diagonal elements of P a (error variances) are computed using a randomization estimate of H T R −1 H. Here an ensemble of 500 random gradients of the cost function are used, based on the convergence of the uniform norm ( . ∞ ) of the inverse Hessian approximation.…”
Section: D-var System and Information Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many perturbed inversions (typically about 50) are needed, each of them requiring numerous forward and adjoint model integrations (iterations) in case the problem is not well conditioned (about 50 iterations for our methane inversion). Alternatively, inverse Hessian approximations based on information from the minimization itself can be employed, but are usually of very low rank (e.g., Meirink et al, 2008;Bousserez et al, 2015). Therefore, most information content analyses in previous trace-gas Bayesian inversion studies have relied on explicit calculations of the inverse Hessian matrix, by either considering a regional domain (e.g., Wecht et al, 2014a) or performing a prior dimension reduction of the control vector (e.g., Wecht et al, 2014b;Turner and Jacob, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%