2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imprints of mass accretion history on the shape of the intracluster medium and the TX–M relation

Abstract: We use a statistical sample of galaxy clusters from a large cosmological N-body+hydrodynamics simulation to examine the relation between morphology, or shape, of the X-ray emitting intracluster medium (ICM) and the mass accretion history of the galaxy clusters. We find that the mass accretion rate (MAR) of a cluster is correlated with the ellipticity of the ICM. The correlation is largely driven by material accreted in the last ∼ 4.5 Gyr, indicating a characteristic time-scale for relaxation of cluster gas. Fu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(72 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computing the accretion rate Γ allows us to determine the accretion phase of halos between two times, from z = 0 to z ∼ 0.5. The redshift interval of ∆z = 0.5 corresponds reasonably well to the expected relaxation timescales of halos (Power et al 2012;Diemer & Kravtsov 2014;More et al 2015;Chen et al 2019). By using the masses of halos at z = 0 and their main progenitor at z = 0.5, we thus computed the continuous accretion rate Γ 200m (z = 0.5) for each halo.…”
Section: Mass Accretion History and Formation Timementioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computing the accretion rate Γ allows us to determine the accretion phase of halos between two times, from z = 0 to z ∼ 0.5. The redshift interval of ∆z = 0.5 corresponds reasonably well to the expected relaxation timescales of halos (Power et al 2012;Diemer & Kravtsov 2014;More et al 2015;Chen et al 2019). By using the masses of halos at z = 0 and their main progenitor at z = 0.5, we thus computed the continuous accretion rate Γ 200m (z = 0.5) for each halo.…”
Section: Mass Accretion History and Formation Timementioning
confidence: 58%
“…The elliptical shape of DM halos is expected to depend on their mass and redshift, as discussed in Allgood et al (2006), Despali et al (2014), Suto et al (2016), Vega-Ferrero et al (2017), high-mass halos tend to be less spherical than low-mass objects. This mass-ellipticity correlation can be attributed to the formation time (Despali et al 2014) and the formation history (Chen et al 2019;Lau et al 2021) of halos. Following the hierarchical formation scenario, more massive structures formed more recently and are thus expected to be more widely disturbed because they did not have enough time to relax.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Hydrodynamical simulations also allowed to validate these parameters with mock X-ray maps (see e.g. Poole et al 2006;Böhringer et al 2010;Morandi et al 2013;Rasia et al 2013;Weißmann et al 2013;Chon et al 2016;Chen et al 2019;Ansarifard et al 2020;Cao et al 2020).…”
Section: D Indicators Of Morphological Regularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes a hydrostatic mass bias in measuring mass from SZ surveys (Planck Collaboration et al 2014;Nelson et al 2014a;Shi et al 2016). The mergers and recent accretions also tend to cause asphericity in the clusters which introduces additional scatter in projected measurements (Chen et al 2019;Lau et al 2021;Machado Poletti Valle et al 2021). Baryonic physics, such as feedback, also adds turbulent pressure support, in addition to the structure formation processes (Battaglia et al 2012;Pike et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%