2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of the cutoff ratio for detecting antibodies against hepatitis A virus in oral fluids by enzyme immunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation of the cut‐off value was also an important step for assay optimization when saliva samples were used because commercial EIAs have been developed for sera samples. In the present study, three methods were evaluated, and the AUROC analysis method provided the best sensitivity as was reported for anti‐HAV (34) and HBsAg detection in saliva samples (25). This method is an important tool to classify continuous variables, such as OD values, in categorical variables, such as positive and negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The calculation of the cut‐off value was also an important step for assay optimization when saliva samples were used because commercial EIAs have been developed for sera samples. In the present study, three methods were evaluated, and the AUROC analysis method provided the best sensitivity as was reported for anti‐HAV (34) and HBsAg detection in saliva samples (25). This method is an important tool to classify continuous variables, such as OD values, in categorical variables, such as positive and negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In MA city almost half of the participants reported that urine could diagnose viral hepatitis. Viral hepatitis markers are detected in urine and other biological fluids such as saliva, semen, breast milk, pancreatic secretions, bile and vaginal, tears, menstrual, pleural, and nasopharyngeal [ 9 , 24 ], but the efficiency of detection in fluids like urine is not ideal for diagnosis of all types of hepatitis viruses [ 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cut‐off value evaluation for anti‐HCV detection from DBS samples was important because commercial EIAs have not been developed for these samples. In this study, the ROC curve was employed for both EIAs, similar to previous studies for HAV and HBV detection from saliva samples [Cruz et al, 2011; Tourinho et al, 2011]. Croom et al [2006] used the cut‐off value established by the manufacturer, and McCarron et al [1999], Parker et al [1999] and Judd et al [2003] employed other CO values for testing DBS samples for anti‐HCV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%