2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00073-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of the yield stress/tensile stress ratio to the SINTAP failure assessment diagrams for homogeneous materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7) suggests that the parameter α can be easily determined when the 0.2% proof (yield) strength is available, and thus the problem remains how to estimate n. At this point, it is worth mentioning that for accurate J estimates, the value of n should be based on engineering stress-strain data, instead of true stress-strain data. Figure 6 shows 1/n values, determined from the power law fit to engineering stress-strain data for various materials (19) . Based on these data, the following equation is proposed to estimate n from σ 0.2 /σ u :…”
Section: Proposed R-o Fit For the Ge/epri Approach -When Only Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) suggests that the parameter α can be easily determined when the 0.2% proof (yield) strength is available, and thus the problem remains how to estimate n. At this point, it is worth mentioning that for accurate J estimates, the value of n should be based on engineering stress-strain data, instead of true stress-strain data. Figure 6 shows 1/n values, determined from the power law fit to engineering stress-strain data for various materials (19) . Based on these data, the following equation is proposed to estimate n from σ 0.2 /σ u :…”
Section: Proposed R-o Fit For the Ge/epri Approach -When Only Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8), and thus the problem remains how to estimate n. It should be reminded that for accurate J estimates, the value of n should be based on engineering stress-strain data, instead of true stress-strain data. Figure 2 (a) shows 1/n values as a function of σ y /σ u , determined from the power law fit to engineering stress-strain data for various materials (18), (19) . Before developing an estimation equation for n from σ y /σ u , one point is worth noting.…”
Section: Cod Estimates Based On Ge/epri Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) or Eq. (18) with 1/n values, determined from the power law fit to true stress-strain data for various materials (18), (19) . Equation (18) is also compared with 1/n values from the power law fit to engineering stress-strain data for the same materials in Fig.…”
Section: Cod Estimates Based On Reference Stress Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from Table 1, other studies have reported (C)WP tests without mentioning the specimen geometry. 26,27 Considering the above, (C)WP specimen geometry and the positions of remote strain sensors should be consciously considered prior to performing an experimental program. This paper summarizes a feasibility study of a new specimen design, summarized in Table 2, based on experimentally validated finite element results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%