Implementing State Standards for Science Education: What District Policy Makers Make of the Hoopla

Abstract

Premised on the assumption that school districts play an important role in the implementation of state and federal policy, this article explores the districts' response to state science standards. Adopting a cognitive perspective on the implementation process, the authors examine the ideas about science education that district policy makers construct from science standards. Our analysis illuminates how the ideas about reforming science education that district policy makers come to understand from new science standards contribute to these standards being adapted at the district level in ways that miss or misrepresent their core intent. The article identifies prominent patterns in district policy makers' understandings of the science reforms. Based on this analysis, the authors argue that a cause of implementation failure, rarely examined in the literature, concerns the ways in which local implementers miss or misconstrue the intent of policy proposals.

Shaping Teacher Sensemaking: School Leaders and the Enactment of Reading Policy

“…However, it is also possible to appropriate a conceptual tool-the underlying theoretical basis at the heart of the practical tool-with or without its practical application. The distinction between appropriation of practical tools and appropriation of conceptual tools is consistent with the distinction made by Spillane and his colleagues (Spillane, 2000b;Spillane & Callahan, 2000) between "form-focused" understandings of policy ideas and "function-focused" understandings.…”

Challenges to Common Core State Standards Implementation: Views From Six States

“…The third rung of the triadic model, Spillane and Callahan's (2000) idea of misunderstanding intent, showed up less frequently in our interviews than the other rungs, but we did find several examples of tensions between familiarity and novelty and form over function.…”

School Leaders as Coupling Agents – Mediating Between External Demands and Internal Values

“…Coburn (2004) took this on board when studying the ways in which teachers responded to new instructions about the teaching of reading and identified five different coupling mechanisms. Similar coupling mechanisms have also been used by other researchers (Spillane and Callahan 2000;Oliver 1991). The five coupling mechanisms identified by Coburn (2004) are:…”