2021
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Pharmacogenomics Testing: Single Center Experience at Arkansas Children’s Hospital

Abstract: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a growing field within precision medicine. Testing can help predict adverse events and sub-therapeutic response risks of certain medications. To date, the US FDA lists over 280 drugs which provide biomarker-based dosing guidance for adults and children. At Arkansas Children’s Hospital (ACH), a clinical PGx laboratory-based test was developed and implemented to provide guidance on 66 pediatric medications for genotype-guided dosing. This PGx test consists of 174 single nucleotide polym… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Genomic Module is relatively new, but several institutions have already implemented it with pharmacogenetic data. 42,45,46 Due to the historical lack of a standard repository for pharmacogenetic data, many implementation sites have used workaround solutions to display test results, such as the problem list field as with Boston Children's Hospital or the allergy list field. 47 However, this is not an ideal solution since laboratory results are not easily found and have sometimes been misplaced in random locations.…”
Section: Pharmacogenetic Test Results Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This Genomic Module is relatively new, but several institutions have already implemented it with pharmacogenetic data. 42,45,46 Due to the historical lack of a standard repository for pharmacogenetic data, many implementation sites have used workaround solutions to display test results, such as the problem list field as with Boston Children's Hospital or the allergy list field. 47 However, this is not an ideal solution since laboratory results are not easily found and have sometimes been misplaced in random locations.…”
Section: Pharmacogenetic Test Results Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within Epic's Genomic Module, a genomics profile can be created to store and display all genomic information for the provider and/or the patient (Figure 2). This Genomic Module is relatively new, but several institutions have already implemented it with pharmacogenetic data 42,45,46 . Due to the historical lack of a standard repository for pharmacogenetic data, many implementation sites have used workaround solutions to display test results, such as the problem list field as with Boston Children's Hospital or the allergy list field 47 .…”
Section: Ehr Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would then require the prescriber to search for the stored results if they wished to make use of them. Where organizations were able to store pharmacogenetic results as a discrete variable within their EHR, they were able to make use of active BPAs (Level 1) ( 36 , 40 , 42 , 56 61 ). These would trigger when a drug was prescribed where there was a clinically actionable pharmacogenetic prescribing recommendation available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2020 for both adult and pediatric patients. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Given that clinical use of genotype-guided CDS for SSRIs in pediatrics is not routine at this time, in this article we will share considerations for pediatric implementation based on our experience at a tertiary medical center including a children's hospital and pediatric behavioral clinics, with the goal of increasing familiarity among pediatric clinicians and healthcare sites. [10][11][12] General PGx considerations that also apply to the adult population should also be reviewed, including availability and form of PGx results, institutional resources supporting implementation, and readiness of providers and patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%