“…Other authors (Modafferi, Boniface, Crowle, Star & Middleton, 2017; Papavlasopoulou, Sharma & Giannakos, 2018; Sharma, Papavlasopoulou & Giannakos, 2019) also opt for self‐evaluation by children over 7 and 8 years old using a Likert scale with emoticons instead of numbers. Some researchers choose mixed designs to complement or verify the results of the MMLA, including qualitative methodologies such as semi‐structured interviews with teachers, children and/or parents (Abrahamson et al ., 2015; Junokas et al ., 2018; Kosmas et al ., 2019; Kourakli et al ., 2017; Martinez‐Maldonado et al , 2017; Pérez et al ., 2018; Spikol et al ., 2018) or direct observations by teachers in the classroom (Kosmas et al ., 2017; Kosmas et al ., 2019). At least until MMLA research possesses standardised tools and strategies suited to children under the age of six, the MMLA “supervised” option seems the most efficient and is the most widely recognised for obtaining quality data.…”