2005
DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2005.850589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a Situation Awareness Assessment Tool for Evaluation of Human–Robot Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For mobile robots, it usually consists of a control station with a graphical user interface, allowing the operator to see, hear and move through the robot platform in a remote location. As the type and number of sensors and DOFs increase on the platform, additions need to be made to the operator interface with the objective of maximizing situation awareness [47][48][49][50] and minimizing cognitive load [50,51]. IRL-1/TR is a great testbed to address such issues, and we used HBBA to design a telepresence system with a remote control interface that integrates proximity, vision, audible and force data in one 3D ecological [52] display.…”
Section: Teleoperation Using 3d Display Of Proximity Visual Audiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mobile robots, it usually consists of a control station with a graphical user interface, allowing the operator to see, hear and move through the robot platform in a remote location. As the type and number of sensors and DOFs increase on the platform, additions need to be made to the operator interface with the objective of maximizing situation awareness [47][48][49][50] and minimizing cognitive load [50,51]. IRL-1/TR is a great testbed to address such issues, and we used HBBA to design a telepresence system with a remote control interface that integrates proximity, vision, audible and force data in one 3D ecological [52] display.…”
Section: Teleoperation Using 3d Display Of Proximity Visual Audiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. (Scholtz et al, 2005)), workload, and accuracy of mental models of device operation. For robot performance, self-awareness, human awareness, and autonomy are listed as suitable metrics.…”
Section: Evaluating Hrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the distant operator, the main challenge of telepresence is understanding an environment in which one is not physically present (Nielsen, Goodrich, & Ricks, 2007). Situation awareness (Endsley, 1988;J. C. Scholtz, Antonishek, & Young, 2005;J.…”
Section: Augmented Teleoperation Feasibility Studymentioning
confidence: 99%