2017
DOI: 10.22491/1678-4669.20170036
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The development of international guidelines for distress assessment gave greater visibility to the importance of psychosocial issues within Oncology services. This study sought to identify the instruments used in Brazil, to describe the procedures for implementing this program and to present the preliminary results of a public hospital. In Brazil these recommendations are little broadcast. However, the feasibility and benefits of this new model of care were proved. There was a substantial increased number of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, treatment within the public hospital system in Brazil is fraught with challenges pertaining to resource availability, and limited social services and psychological resources may certainly have an impact on our findings, assuming that few patients received support. Before we started the screening program, we noted that less than 5% of patients received psychosocial support …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, treatment within the public hospital system in Brazil is fraught with challenges pertaining to resource availability, and limited social services and psychological resources may certainly have an impact on our findings, assuming that few patients received support. Before we started the screening program, we noted that less than 5% of patients received psychosocial support …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large proportion of patients reported moderate to severe distress, close to the one described among patients with metastatic cancer Mitchell et al, 2011) and higher than the one reported in a sample of Brazilian patients treated in private or public health care settings (Bergerot et al, 2016;Bergerot et al, 2017). This difference can be understood by the epidemiological characteristic of this disease (rare cancers), age group (young age is a risk factor), site of disease and treatment modalities (Acquati et al, 2018;Bergerot et al, 2018;Carpentier et al, 2011;Giese-Davis et al, 2012;Horick et al, 2017;Hoyt et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The programme proposal was presented and discussed with the staff. With the approval of the team, the process was gradually implemented (Bergerot et al 2017) [ 79 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative ideology asserts success as being related to a health system guideline’s ability to achieve its recommended target and improve care [ 78 ]. Only a small proportion of studies included in our review compared guideline targets with real-world changes or leveraged patient-level outcomes to identify improvements in quality of life and health outcomes [ 75 , 79 ]. The integration of patient- and population-level outcomes may be an important component in the evaluation of health system guidelines in LMICs, as an ultimate goal of a resilient and sustainable health system is to better serve patients and families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%