2019
DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a model of care for hospitalised older persons with cognitive impairment (the Confused Hospitalised Older Persons program) in six New South Wales hospitals

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the implementation of a model of care known as the Confused Hospitalised Older Persons (CHOPs) program to improve recognition, assessment and management of older persons with cognitive impairment (delirium and/or dementia) admitted to acute hospitals. Methods: The model of care was implemented in six selected hospitals across New South Wales. Pre-and postimplementation medical record audits, environmental audits, and staff knowledge and care confidence surveys were performed. Interviews … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (“overview of included studies”), the selected studies were performed in 12 countries with 13 studies (52%) from Europe [5567], eight (32%) from North America [68–75] and four (16%) from Australia [76–79]. Of the studies 11 (44%) were conducted using a pre-test and post-test design [55, 59, 60, 65, 68, 7173, 75, 78, 79], six (24%) studies were performed as a prospective observational study [57, 62, 63, 67, 69, 70] and four (16%) studies were RCTs [56, 64, 66, 77]. Furthermore, one nonrandomized study (combined with pre-test and post-test design) [61], one propensity-matched cohort study [74], and two qualitative studies were conducted [58, 76].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 (“overview of included studies”), the selected studies were performed in 12 countries with 13 studies (52%) from Europe [5567], eight (32%) from North America [68–75] and four (16%) from Australia [76–79]. Of the studies 11 (44%) were conducted using a pre-test and post-test design [55, 59, 60, 65, 68, 7173, 75, 78, 79], six (24%) studies were performed as a prospective observational study [57, 62, 63, 67, 69, 70] and four (16%) studies were RCTs [56, 64, 66, 77]. Furthermore, one nonrandomized study (combined with pre-test and post-test design) [61], one propensity-matched cohort study [74], and two qualitative studies were conducted [58, 76].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age cohorts of older individuals varied considerably: one study recruited patients at the age of ≥60 years [69], eight (32%) included participants at the age of ≥65 years [56, 68, 70, 74, 76–79], two included patients at ≥69 years [66, 73], 7 (28%) recruited patients at ≥70 years [57, 59, 61, 63, 64, 67, 75], and one included patients at ≥75 years of age [55]. Of the included studies two used two age cohorts of older inpatients (80 years and older/70–79 years [71]; 64 years/74 years and older [72]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kurrle et al explore the implementation of a model of care for hospitalised older patients with cognitive impairment, called the CHOPS program. In six New South Wales hospitals, increases in cognitive screening, risk identification, assessment and the management of cognitive impairment, plus communication with carers, were found.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%