Implementation barriers and facilitators of an integrated multidisciplinary lifestyle enhancing treatment for inpatients with severe mental illness: the MULTI study IV

Abstract

BackgroundDespite an increase in studies showing the efficacy of lifestyle interventions in improving the poor health outcomes for people with severe mental illness (SMI), routine implementation remains ad hoc. Recently, a multidisciplinary lifestyle enhancing treatment for inpatients with SMI (MULTI) was implemented as part of routine care at a long-term inpatient facility in the Netherlands, resulting in significant health improvements after 18 months. The current study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators of its implementation.MethodsDeterminants associated with the implementation of MULTI, related to the innovation, the users (patients, the healthcare professionals (HCPs)), and the organisational context, were assessed at the three wards that delivered MULTI. The evidence-based Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations was used to assess determinants (29 items), each measured through a 5-point Likert scale and additional open-ended questions. We considered determinants to which ≥20% of the HCPs or patients responded negatively (“totally disagree/disagree”, score < 3) as barriers and to which ≥80% of HCPs or patients responded positively (“agree/totally agree”, score > 3) as facilitators. We included responses to open-ended questions if the topic was mentioned by ≥2 HCPs or patients. In total 50 HCPs (online questionnaire) and 46 patients (semi-structured interview) were invited to participate in the study.ResultsParticipating HCPs (n = 42) mentioned organisational factors as the strongest barriers (e.g. organisational changes and financial resources). Patients (n = 33) mentioned the complexity of participating in MULTI as the main barrier, which could partly be due to organisational factors (e.g. lack of time for nurses to improve tailoring). The implementation was facilitated by positive attitudes of HCPs and patients towards MULTI, including their own role in it. Open responses of HCPs and patients showed strong commitment, collaboration and ownership towards MULTI.ConclusionsThis is the first study analysing the implementation of a pragmatic lifestyle intervention targeting SMI inpatients in routine clinical care. Positive attitudes of both HCPs and patients towards such an approach facilitated the implementation of MULTI. We suggest that strategies addressing organisational implementation barriers are needed to further improve and maintain MULTI, to succeed in achieving positive health-related outcomes in inpatients with SMI.

A Perspective on the Integration of eHealth in Treatment of Offenders: Combining Technology and the Risk-Need-Responsivity Model

“…First, a pitfall of current treatment is that most forensic psychiatric patients are not that motivated for their often mandatory treatment (8,9). Second, many forensic psychiatric patients experience difficulties with reflecting on their own behavior and emotions, which is an important skill for psychological treatment (10)(11)(12). Third, the forensic psychiatric patient population is extremely heterogeneous: there is no "typical" forensic psychiatric patient due to a large diversity in type of offense, mental disorders and socio-demographic background (13).…”

Organization of Community Mental Health Services for Persons with a Severe Mental Illness and Comorbid Somatic Conditions: A Systematic Review on Somatic Outcomes and Health Related Quality of Life

“…A focus on a more contextual research approach, as in the domain of implementation science, could provide a broader view of confounding and essential aspects in the implementation of interventions in community care. In the need for a more systematic strategy towards implementation, the PRACTIS framework as proposed by Koorts et al could be an ideal framework in implementing community based interventions in a more systematic way with regard for the complexity of different contexts [ 13 , 80 , 87 ]. Evidence accentuates the possible use of digital tools in further research regarding physical health in mental healthcare [ 81 ].…”

Evaluation of an Adaptive Implementation Program for Cognitive Adaptation Training for People With Severe Mental Illness: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

“…The MIDI was developed based upon a systematic review and a Delphi study among implementation experts, thereby ensuring content validity. Although psychometric properties have not yet been established, other studies in mental health administering the MIDI among health care professionals showed an internal consistency (Cronbach α) between .61-.93 [ 32 , 33 ].…”