2005
DOI: 10.1177/112067210501500413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantation of Stimulation Electrodes in the Subretinal Space to Demonstrate Cortical Responses in Yucatan Minipig in the Course of Visual Prosthesis Development

Abstract: The feasibility of subretinal stimulation of the retina was demonstrated in a retinal model that is similar to the human retina. This animal model therefore offers a suitable means of studying the tolerability of stimulation situations in the course of visual prosthesis development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anatomic similarities to human eyes, along with comparable physiologic processes, enable miniature swine to be good candidates for surgical procedures and reliable for model development and subsequent testing of potential therapeutic agents (Kyhn et al 2008;Rosolen, Rigaudiere, and Le Gargasson 2003;Sachs et al 2005). Swindle and Ravi 2007;Reilly et al 2008, Ruiz-Ederra et al 2005Shafiee et al 2008;Kyhn et al 2008;Iandiev et al 2006;Czajka et al 2004;Sachs et al 2005;Petters et al 1997). The pig does not have a tapetum lucidum, a true macula, or a fovea; they do have a cone-rich visual streak (Fernandez de Castro et al 2014).…”
Section: Ophthalmology Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anatomic similarities to human eyes, along with comparable physiologic processes, enable miniature swine to be good candidates for surgical procedures and reliable for model development and subsequent testing of potential therapeutic agents (Kyhn et al 2008;Rosolen, Rigaudiere, and Le Gargasson 2003;Sachs et al 2005). Swindle and Ravi 2007;Reilly et al 2008, Ruiz-Ederra et al 2005Shafiee et al 2008;Kyhn et al 2008;Iandiev et al 2006;Czajka et al 2004;Sachs et al 2005;Petters et al 1997). The pig does not have a tapetum lucidum, a true macula, or a fovea; they do have a cone-rich visual streak (Fernandez de Castro et al 2014).…”
Section: Ophthalmology Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, numerous functional studies dealing with specific regions of the cortex have been performed either in miniature or conventional domestic pig. According to the existing literature, we propose an approximate mapping of the pig's cortical areas in Figure 2.Functional studies have successfully explored the visual cortex of the pig with EP recordings (Laube et al, 2003;Sachs et al, 2005;Strain et al, 2006) or functional MRI (Fang et al, 2006;Gizewski et al, 2007). Exploration of the auditory cortices has also been addressed with EP recordings in miniature pig (Andrews et al, 1990) or cytoarchitectonic techniques in domestic pigs (Plogmann and Kruska, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species involved include rats (n=6) [26,29,76,80,81,96], rabbits (n=14) [33,36,42,72,73,90,94,95,102,103,105,106,116,121], cats (n=18) [18, 19, 21-23, 30, 32, 43, 78, 79, 82, 93, 98, 99, 101, 114, 117, 120], dogs (n=4) [16,39,40,66], sheep (n=1) [51] and pigs/minipigs (n=9) [34,42,49,59,69,91,92,100,102]. Two papers [16,26] which involved three animal species do not figure in Table 2 due to lack of space, but are discussed in the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, minipigs and pigs have featured extensively in prosthesis research. Published studies include feasibility/safety of implant procedures [34,92], control of retinal-implant contact using impedance measurements [49], long-term biocompatibility [42,59,69,102], physiological effects of the implants using epidural recordings of evoked cortical potentials [59,91,92,100,102] and behavioural reactions to electrical stimulation [34].…”
Section: Pig/minipigmentioning
confidence: 99%