2014
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser for myopia: comparison using an adaptive optics visual simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Follow up period extended for one year and showed significant difference in Spherical error, cylindrical error and spherical equivalent. Spherical equivalent of ICL group mean value was (0.0000±0.433) and that of the Femtosecond assisted group (-1.12±0.748) with (p<0.004*) this data is consistent with Cari perez-vives et al [29]. The above mentioned changes of spherical equivalent of manifest refraction equal or more than (1.00D) in an interval of 6 months is known as stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Follow up period extended for one year and showed significant difference in Spherical error, cylindrical error and spherical equivalent. Spherical equivalent of ICL group mean value was (0.0000±0.433) and that of the Femtosecond assisted group (-1.12±0.748) with (p<0.004*) this data is consistent with Cari perez-vives et al [29]. The above mentioned changes of spherical equivalent of manifest refraction equal or more than (1.00D) in an interval of 6 months is known as stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The safety and efficacy indices were 1.19 ± 0.23 and 1.04 ± 0.27, there were no declines in BCDVA, and all the patients were satisfied with their vision, implying that ICL-V4c implantation is safe and efficient for high ametropia correction. Pérez-Vives C [35] and Ganesh S [36] investigated the differences in visual and refractive results between the ICL procedure and corneal refractive surgery. The outcomes demonstrated that the quality of vision and patient satisfaction is better with ICL than with femtosecond-LASIK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phakic intraocular lenses, including implantable collamer lenses (ICL) have brought a remarkable progress in the management of high and extreme myopia, as compared to keratorefractive surgeries, being less likely to produce HOA and provide better outcomes of visual quality defined by modular transfer function (MTF), point spread function (PSF), visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity [ 6 - 8 ]. Nevertheless, changes in wavefront aberrations after the operation are significant, adverse impacts being the most obvious on near vision [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%