2017
DOI: 10.1111/aman.12924
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Imperial expansion can produce broad economic intensification throughout the provinces to provide key economic resources for the state. However, not all such economic intensification is the direct result of the imposition of an imperial political economy over subject populations. This article presents evidence for some cases where intensification occurred due to bottom‐up responses of small groups that were able to profit from imperial conquest. In the case of the Incas, although the imposition of a labor‐tax … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On a broader scale, this study’s findings illuminate some mechanisms that articulated the political economy of the Inca empire, demonstrating the limitations of state power in the provinces to enforce more powerful means of labor reorganization. At the same time, the use of the scarce local labor to intensify mining production might have limited the output of these activities, influencing particular dynamics of coercion and local agency, which contributed to the creation of either more negotiated or violent political relations in the imperial margins [ 12 , 27 ]. More studies in different provincial territories would enable us to better understand how extensive the Inca resettlement policy actually was outside of the imperial core, with all the political and economic consequences that this implies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a broader scale, this study’s findings illuminate some mechanisms that articulated the political economy of the Inca empire, demonstrating the limitations of state power in the provinces to enforce more powerful means of labor reorganization. At the same time, the use of the scarce local labor to intensify mining production might have limited the output of these activities, influencing particular dynamics of coercion and local agency, which contributed to the creation of either more negotiated or violent political relations in the imperial margins [ 12 , 27 ]. More studies in different provincial territories would enable us to better understand how extensive the Inca resettlement policy actually was outside of the imperial core, with all the political and economic consequences that this implies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the paucity of mitmaqkuna presence in the archaeological record, most major changes in terms of the economic intensification of production have been attributed to their presence, or to the general application of the labor tax system. This situation has been largely assumed than demonstrated, particularly in the far provinces of the empire [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the emphasis on socionatures, there are strong currents within the scholarly literature that are dissolving the categories (e.g., chiefdoms, states, horizons) that have long been the mainstays of political archaeology. Contemporary archaeologists have grown uncomfortable with approaches that assume binaries of king and commoner, colonizer and colonized, core and periphery, and even change and continuity (Baitzel ; Brown ; Garrido and Salazar ; Gron and Sørensen ; Jaffe, Wei, and Zhao ; Kuusela, Nurmi, and Hakamäki ). By and large, research is turning from state or imperial politics to shed light on decentralized complexity, whether the interactions by which people composed networks and communities without the state (e.g., Boivin and Frachetti ; Kristiansen, Lindkvist, and Myrdal ), the “bottom‐up” tactics by which people in rural or peripheral environments endured or withstood centralized rule (Düring and Stek ; LaViolette and Fleisher ), or the “epi‐historical” struggles of Indigenous people who underwent successive colonial projects.…”
Section: Decentralized Complexity and Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo relevante en el caso de Copiapó es el proceso selectivo de apropiación de los patrones de diseño diaguita e inca. Esta variabilidad podría deberse en parte a la baja jerarquización política y alta diversidad social de jefaturas locales en Copiapó (Castillo, 1998;Hidalgo, 1972), lo cual podría ser reflejo de una administración imperial relativamente descentralizada, en donde no todas las comunidades de la región fueron integradas a la economía política inca ni al sistema de la mit'a (Garrido y Salazar, 2017). En la misma línea, los múltiples modos de reinterpretación e hibridación de los referentes estilísticos Copiapó, Diaguita y Cuzqueños sugiere un escenario fragmentado de negociaciones en la incorporación de estas poblaciones al imperio.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified