2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance analysis of adherent cells after in situ electroporation: Non-invasive monitoring during intracellular manipulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4B). Our apoptotic data and previous experiments correlated such changes to the loss of cellular monolayer resulting from cell death and cell de-attachment (Arndt et al, 2004; Stolwijk et al, 2011). Contrary, cells exposed to 10 and 25 nM digitoxin showed a significant increase in α relative to controls, indicating a stimulation of their cellular attachment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…4B). Our apoptotic data and previous experiments correlated such changes to the loss of cellular monolayer resulting from cell death and cell de-attachment (Arndt et al, 2004; Stolwijk et al, 2011). Contrary, cells exposed to 10 and 25 nM digitoxin showed a significant increase in α relative to controls, indicating a stimulation of their cellular attachment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This may be because, as previously stated, for 800 V/cm and 1200 V/cm irreversible damage is produced in the cell membrane. The obtained values are in accordance with observations made previously by other authors who also measured durations of around one second for the total lifetime of the short-term membrane resealing mechanisms [21,[54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Electrical measurements have usually been performed by observing the changes in the applied current-voltage waveform, which mainly consist of quasi-dc conductivity changes. Other attempts have used AC signals to study the passive electrical properties of the sample before and after electroporation at single frequencies [21][22][23]. Only in a few studies have multifrequency measurements been performed, also referred to as electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), on electroporated samples [20,24,25].…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coplanar patterning of thin-film electrodes on cell culture ware makes solid substrate-based impedance measurements consistent and compatible with in vitro cell culture, immunofluorescence staining and biochemical assays. Even combinations with other electrical methods that use thin-film electrodes can be easily achieved, such as in situ electroporation of cells [95], Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) [44], Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) [68], that allow for multiparametric analysis of the cell culture. Substrate-integrated electrodes can either be arranged as interdigitated comb structures (IDEs) [31,71,92,5] or use a small working electrode (WE) in combination with a large counter electrode (CE) (Fig.…”
Section: Overview Of Endothelial Barrier Function Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a cell layer with a transfection efficiency of 80% it is still possible that none of the cells on the actual electrode is actually transfected (extreme case, 8W1E). In situ electroporation using the ECIS electrodes to introduce siRNA, cDNA or other macromolecules into cells [95] could provide an interesting possible solution, as transfection is restricted to the cell population directly on the electrode. Toxic side effects of transfection reagents or massive protein overexpression can significantly affect survival rate and the process of cell layer maturation, and as a consequence baseline resistance of the cell layer.…”
Section: Experimental Settings and Practical Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%