2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0044-59672011000100012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacto da conversão floresta - pastagem nos estoques e na dinâmica do carbono e substâncias húmicas do solo no bioma Amazônico

Abstract: RESUMOO presente estudo avaliou as consequências do desmatamento e a utilização do solo com Brachiaria brizantha em relação ao estoque e dinâmica de C e frações húmicas em duas floresta-pastagem no Acre. A primeira localizada sequências município de Rio Branco em área de Floresta Aberta com bambu e palmeira e duas pastagens de B. brizantha de 3 e 10 anos com predomínio de Argissolo Vermelho-Amarelo alítico plíntico. O segundo situado no município de Senador Guiomard em área de Floresta Densa e pastagem de B. b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
23

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
23
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Quanto aos valores de δ 13 C, o tratamento FFF, representado pela floresta pouco alterada, cuja principal característica é de não ter sido convertida em outro uso, apresentou os menores valores de δ 13 C, 2010), em estudos também realizados na Floresta Atlântica, assim como os realizados em outros biomas brasileiros (Roscoe et al, 2000;Jantalia et al, 2007;Martinelli et al, 2009;Costa Júnior et al, 2011;Araújo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Abundância Natural De 13 Cunclassified
“…Quanto aos valores de δ 13 C, o tratamento FFF, representado pela floresta pouco alterada, cuja principal característica é de não ter sido convertida em outro uso, apresentou os menores valores de δ 13 C, 2010), em estudos também realizados na Floresta Atlântica, assim como os realizados em outros biomas brasileiros (Roscoe et al, 2000;Jantalia et al, 2007;Martinelli et al, 2009;Costa Júnior et al, 2011;Araújo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Abundância Natural De 13 Cunclassified
“…The lowest values were found in the backslope of the forest (F2), while the highest values were found in the summit profile of the pasture (P1), with a maximum value of 5.5 in the soil surface. Based on these pH values, the profiles under forest can be classified as extremely to strongly acid (Santos et al, 2013c), whereas, under pasture, the soils are less acid, probably due to soil management, as the use of fire for forest removal is very common in this region, and the ashes deposited on the soil elevate the value of pH, which can remain high for decades, as shown by Mcgrath et al (2001), Quesada et al (2010), and Araújo et al (2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of other studies has been on changes caused by land use conversion on chemical properties (Mcgrath et al, 2001;Braz et al, 2013), soil C stocks and dynamics Araújo et al, 2011;van Straaten et al, 2015), changes in the quantity and quality of shoot biomass (Fearnside and Barbosa, 1998;Lohbeck et al, 2015), emission of greenhouse gases through burning of forests and/or pastures (Fearnside, 2002;Fujisaki et al, 2015), soil biological activity (Silva et al, 2012;Rodrigues et al, 2013;Cram et al, 2015), reduction in ecosystem services , and negative impacts on the invertebrate communities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutrient contents in soils of CLI, CLFI, and PAST systems were higher than in NF, especially in the 0-0.10 m depth range. The concentrations of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ we measured in the upper 0.4 m of soil would classify this soil as being low to very low, according to the classification proposed by Araújo et al (2011). In these soils, the low cation exchange capacity (CEC) is caused by the predominance of low activity clays, associated with low organic carbon content (SOUZA; MELO, 2003).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This result may be attributed to the greater participation of humin, which represents about 70 % of the TOC. Humin fractions are considered to be the most recalcitrant portions in the soil and so have a higher potential for interaction with its colloidal mineral matrix (ARAÚJO et al, 2011). In addition, the fractions AF and AH are less stable and they are easily mineralized in soil, which reduces their residual content (FONTANA et al, 2006).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%