1999
DOI: 10.3109/17453679909000952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaction bone-grafting increases the holding power of cancellous screws in the femoral head : A pull-out study in human cadaver hips

Abstract: We studied the effect of impaction of fresh cancellous bone or demineralized bone matrix (DBM) around cancellous screws in 25 cadaver femoral heads. The bone mineral content (BMC) of femoral heads was measured to determine if greater relative increase in holding power will be achieved by impaction-grafting, as the BMC of the specimen decreases. A 60% (p < 0.001) relative increase in the pull-out force was achieved by impaction-grafting with DBM, compared to non-grafted controls. The augmenting effect of fresh … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the human cadaveric femurs at present examined, tests yielded high linear correlation coefficients of sBMD and T-score with pull-out force (R 2 5 0.89 and 0.93 respectively), shear stress (R 2 5 0.89 and 0.93 respectively), and energy (R 2 5 0.79 and 0.82 respectively). This finding corroborates the more modest correlations of previous studies of cancellous bone screws extracted from the human cancellous bone of the femoral head (R 2 5 0.31) and the calcaneus (R 2 5 0.59) [28,33]. This may suggest that clinical bone scans of patients prior to any surgical fracture repair involving cancellous bone (such as the treatment of subcapital, cervical, or basicervical femoral neck fractures) may be predictive in the quality of screw purchase achieved and, hence, the overall success of the procedure.…”
Section: Implications For Clinical Practicesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the human cadaveric femurs at present examined, tests yielded high linear correlation coefficients of sBMD and T-score with pull-out force (R 2 5 0.89 and 0.93 respectively), shear stress (R 2 5 0.89 and 0.93 respectively), and energy (R 2 5 0.79 and 0.82 respectively). This finding corroborates the more modest correlations of previous studies of cancellous bone screws extracted from the human cancellous bone of the femoral head (R 2 5 0.31) and the calcaneus (R 2 5 0.59) [28,33]. This may suggest that clinical bone scans of patients prior to any surgical fracture repair involving cancellous bone (such as the treatment of subcapital, cervical, or basicervical femoral neck fractures) may be predictive in the quality of screw purchase achieved and, hence, the overall success of the procedure.…”
Section: Implications For Clinical Practicesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The cancellous screw average shear stress values for current 4GCF solid (2.84 ¡ 0.20 MPa), 4GCF cellular (4.31 ¡ 0.41 MPa), human femurs (4.66 ¡ 4.22 MPa), and finite element model (2.29 and 4.70 MPa) showed excellent overlap with the overall range from previous studies in which cancellous screws of 6.5 mm diameter were extracted from human cancellous bone. For the femoral head, average shear stresses have been reported to be 0.75 MPa [29], 3.99 ¡ 2.13 MPa [28], and 4.41 MPa [29]. For the distal femoral plateau, results achieved were 1.17 ¡ 1.34 MPa [30].…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean density for the osteoporotic bone simulation was 0.192 g/cm 3 (force of compression 3.33 Mpa) as indicated by the manufacturer and correlated to a calculated age of 94 years [40]. Lenzner [37] reported bone densities between 0.190 g/cm 3 and 0.394 g/cm 3 (mean 0.272 g/cm 3 ) in his studies and correlated the bone density with the ability of the hip screw to maintain fracture stability in human femoral heads using QCT-assisted analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To some extent, it is arched, so as to be convex in front. The distal portion is fairly cuboid in the form and is larger in comparison with the proximal portion [52]. The long shaft of the femur, i.e.…”
Section: Human Femurmentioning
confidence: 97%