2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-8368(01)00036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact response and damage tolerance characteristics of glass–carbon/epoxy hybrid composite plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
91
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naik et al [105] reported that the compression-after-impact strength of carbon/glass hybrids was higher than that of both reference composites. Interestingly, the highest values were reported for the hybrids where the carbon was on the outside.…”
Section: Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naik et al [105] reported that the compression-after-impact strength of carbon/glass hybrids was higher than that of both reference composites. Interestingly, the highest values were reported for the hybrids where the carbon was on the outside.…”
Section: Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly there are five kinds of structure styles of hybrid composites: intraply, interplay, sandwich, intraply/interplay, and super hybrid composites. Many references [9][10][11][12][13] have experimental and numerical study on the low-velocity impact behavior of foam-filled sandwich panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies on hybrid composites under different loading conditions: tensile [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], compressive [10,11], low velocity impact [12][13][14][15][16][17], flexure [12,14,18,19] and fatigue [19,20]. It is generally observed that the failure strain increases significantly for hybrid composites compared with those of high-modulus and low-strain component of the hybrid composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%