2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the method and success of pharyngeal reconstruction on the outcome of treating laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers with pharyngolaryngectomy: A national analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choice of reconstruction, and specifically the use of alimentary tract conduits, worsens short-and long-term survival. This may be due to added physiological stress the patient is placed under because of the opening of abdominal or thoracic and abdominal cavities [39]. Functional results are, in the best-case scenario, comparable with those obtained using fasciocutaneous free flaps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Choice of reconstruction, and specifically the use of alimentary tract conduits, worsens short-and long-term survival. This may be due to added physiological stress the patient is placed under because of the opening of abdominal or thoracic and abdominal cavities [39]. Functional results are, in the best-case scenario, comparable with those obtained using fasciocutaneous free flaps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Piazza et al showed that first-line application of RF and ALT free flaps with long-lasting salivary by-pass stent in reconstruction after partial or total pharyngo-laryngectomy allows obtaining reduced incidences of both fistula and stenosis [24]. Nouraei et al [39] supported the use of free flaps even in terms of overall survival regardless of tumor stage (p < 0.05). The treatment sequence should be taken in account; our believe, confirmed by literature, is that primary definitive radiotherapy followed by salvage surgery when indicated, is inferior in terms of survival and functional outcome [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In keeping with published trends, the majority of patients were male and aged in their 60s. 6,7 The number of patients presenting with late disease (stage III or IV, AJCC Seventh Edition criteria) was 100%, notably higher than that quoted in other published studies which range from 70% to 85%. 2,8 Prior data from the same unit at Princess Alexandra Hospital a decade earlier found only 67.8% of patients presented with stage III or IV disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…There have been multiple modifications and improvements in the procedure since it was first performed. In the present day, reconstructive options include primary closure, local flap closure, pectoralis myocutaneous flap closure, free tissue transfer (including radial forearm, free jejunum flap and anterolateral thigh flap) and gastric pull‐up . The main reconstructive goal is to create a conduit from the oropharynx to the cervical oesophagus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present day, reconstructive options include primary closure, local flap closure, pectoralis myocutaneous flap closure, free tissue transfer (including radial forearm, free jejunum flap and anterolateral thigh flap) and gastric pull-up. 2 The main reconstructive goal is to create a conduit from the oropharynx to the cervical oesophagus. The ideal reconstructive method minimises perioperative morbidity, does not delay initiation of adjuvant therapies and allows optimal restoration of swallow function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%