2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Pre-Procedural Blood Pressure on Long-Term Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
21
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most recently, a large retrospective analysis associated higher preprocedural PP (high SBP combined with low DBP) with a higher incidence of MI and stroke at 1 year after PCI. 6 Our findings are in part consistent with those previous studies. We found that after adjusting for several confounders, subjects with high baseline PP who underwent PCI were at an increased risk (9% risk increase along the 2 years) of having the combination of clinically relevant ischemic events and safety-related bleeding events, namely NACE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most recently, a large retrospective analysis associated higher preprocedural PP (high SBP combined with low DBP) with a higher incidence of MI and stroke at 1 year after PCI. 6 Our findings are in part consistent with those previous studies. We found that after adjusting for several confounders, subjects with high baseline PP who underwent PCI were at an increased risk (9% risk increase along the 2 years) of having the combination of clinically relevant ischemic events and safety-related bleeding events, namely NACE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…5 Recently, a retrospective study demonstrated that the combination of high SBP and low DBPda wide PPdbefore PCI is associated with myocardial infarction and stroke at 1 year after the procedure. 6 Although previous studies have reported PP predicting poor clinical outcomes after PCI, they were mainly conducted in registries with outdated PCI approaches (balloon angioplasty and bare metal stent implantation) in selected PCI population. Thus, data on PP association with outcomes in clinical trials including a large all-comers population with CAD who have undergone contemporary PCI are lacking.…”
Section: R Esum Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We caution, however, that the chronic impact of glucose and insulin per se on arterial stiffness includes a more complex vascular remodeling not seen with the acute metabolic interventions studied here. For example, widened pulse pressure has been associated with DM in many studies [47][48][49] , but we did not see a change in pulse pressure within any protocol of the current study. Acute alterations in arterial stiffness result from changes in endothelial function, vascular tone, heart rate, and other causes, whereas chronic arterial stiffening is mainly due to vascular remodeling, brosis, and calci cation 50 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…There is some evidence supporting wide PP as a poor prognostic indicator for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with higher rates of postoperative myocardial infarction and stroke, 61,62 although cases of idiopathic peri‐operative wide PP without adverse clinical outcomes have also been described 63 . In a study of 10 876 patients undergoing PCI, patients with wide PP were more often women with higher rates of hypercholesterolemia, kidney dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, and multiple vessel of left main coronary artery disease 62 . Therefore, it is likely that wide PP is instead an indicator of a higher‐risk patient population with a worse prognosis due to poor vascular health and other pre‐existing risk factors.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%