Impact of nutrition counselling on nutrition knowledge and nutrient intake of 7- to 9-y-old children in an atherosclerosis prevention project

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of nutrition counselling given to 7.5-to 9-y-old children and their parents on children's nutrition knowledge and nutrient intakes. Design and subjects: The study children are participants in a prospective, randomised STRIP study (Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project for Children), whose aim was to decrease the intakes of saturated fat and cholesterol while increasing the intake of unsaturated fat in the intervention children from the age of 7 months onwards. Nutrition counselling was given only to the parents until the child's age of 7 y. Nutrition knowledge and nutrient intakes (total energy, total fat, saturated fat, unsaturated fat and sodium) were studied in a time-restricted cohort of 47, 7-y-old intervention and 51 control children. Thereafter, nutrition counselling was given both to the children and parents. Children's nutrition knowledge and nutrient intakes were measured again at the age of 9 y. Results: Biannual nutrition counselling given to the intervention children and the parents maintained the differences in saturated fatty acid intake attained during the intervention given to the parents alone (11.5 vs 13.3 E% (percent of energy intake), at the age of 7 y, Po0.01; 11.1 vs 13.4 E% at the age of 9 y, respectively; Po0.01). The intervention children used more polyunsaturated fatty acids at the age of 9 y than the control children (5.7 vs 5.1 E%, P ¼ 0.05). At 7 y, the intervention and control children had similar nutrition knowledge scores (total knowledge score 12.9 vs 12.0, respectively, P ¼ 0.13). After 1.5 y of nutrition intervention, at 9 y, the intervention children's nutrition knowledge was higher than that of the controls (total nutrition score 16.5 vs 13.2, respectively, Po0.001) and the ability to explain the reasons for their picture choices in the nutrition knowledge test had increased. Conclusion: This study showed that only a relatively short period of counselling with low input is needed to increase in children's nutrition knowledge and ability to explain nutrition-related subjects if advice has first been given to the parents and if the parents have received reinforcement and concrete help with parent-child communication after their children have been involved in the counselling. The differences attained in nutrient intake could also be maintained.

Diet, Overweight, Elevated Blood Pressure, and Acanthosis Nigricans Among K-9th Grade Native American Students

“…Children as young as seven years of age are able to grasp concrete concepts about foods and their health benefits. Research indicates that children who are exposed to healthy food patterns early in their lives are able to explain their consumption of healthier foods at a later date (Rasanen et al, 2004). The inclusion of parents in the active learning process increases the likelihood that children will learn and recognize healthy food choices.…”

Carbohydrate intake, serum lipids and apolipoprotein E phenotype show association in children

“…The intervention families received individualized counselling aimed at decreasing the child’s intake of saturated fatty acid (SAFA) and cholesterol and increasing the intake of monounsaturated (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) (21). The control families received only general dietary information as delivered at the Finnish well‐baby clinics and in the school health‐care.…”

Can we slow the rising incidence of childhood-onset autoimmune diabetes? The overload hypothesis

“…Intervention programmes leading to significant changes in eating patterns and physical activity are successful in preventing type 2 diabetes in adults [49]. Nutrition counselling given to parents when the child is 7 months of age and repeated at 6-monthly intervals up to the age of 7 years has been shown to change the eating habits of the children compared with those of control children whose parents did not receive the intervention [50].…”