2007
DOI: 10.14358/pers.73.7.793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Lidar Nominal Post-spacing on DEM Accuracy and Flood Zone Delineation

Abstract: Lidar data have become a major source of digital terrain information for use in many applications including hydraulic modeling and flood plane mapping. Based on established relationships between sampling intensity and error, nominal post-spacing likely contributes significantly to the error budget. Post-spacing is also a major cost factor during lidar data collection. This research presents methods for establishing a relationship between nominal post-spacing and its effects on hydraulic modeling for flood zone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TLS survey was conducted during a spring low tide to minimize the area of water cover on the marsh surface. The 1550 nm near-infrared laser pulse used by this system is heavily absorbed by water or scattered (due to specular reflectance) [33] and hence information cannot be reliably captured from inundated areas. Furthermore, the scanner utilizes online waveform processing to enable multi-return echo detection with up to 10+ echoes per an emitted laser pulse, although such a high number of returns is not expected in a marsh environment.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TLS survey was conducted during a spring low tide to minimize the area of water cover on the marsh surface. The 1550 nm near-infrared laser pulse used by this system is heavily absorbed by water or scattered (due to specular reflectance) [33] and hence information cannot be reliably captured from inundated areas. Furthermore, the scanner utilizes online waveform processing to enable multi-return echo detection with up to 10+ echoes per an emitted laser pulse, although such a high number of returns is not expected in a marsh environment.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR data were decimated according to the methodology described by Raber et al [41]. A decimation level 0 (D0) represented the original dataset characterized by a point density of approximately 3.2 pulses m −2 .…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approach does not fully mimic the actual reduction that would be obtained with different flights, it allows study of the most important factor in canopy height modelling. For this purpose, several alternatives have been proposed, as follows: (i) a random reduction over the entire dataset (Anderson et al, 2006;Liu and Zhang, 2008;Puetz et al, 2009), (ii) a systematic reduction in each scan line (Gueudet, 2004;Raber et al, 2007;Magnusson et al, 2007;Treitz et al, 2010), and (iii) a reduction by randomly maintaining one return within a grid cell of a specific size (Magnusson, 2006;Gobakken and Naesset, 2007). The first alternative may not preserve the order and regularity of the original LiDAR data.…”
Section: Preparation Of Lidar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%