2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of land use types and farming practices on occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) Taita-Taveta district in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
39
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although studies had shown that tillage or land-use changes could display negative or no effects on AMF diversity [62][63][64][65][66], AMF diversity in both the rhizosphere soils and roots associated with C. dactylon in this study was significantly higher at CL than at DNC, and then at NCND ( Table 2). Explanations for such different effects could be (1) the host plants that were tested were different, C. dactylon in this study was a flooding-tolerant herbaceous plant with adventitious roots and aerenchyma, as AMF diversity was affected by the host plant identity [60,61]; (2) the land-use intensity was different, as the AMF diversity was affected by land-use intensity [67].…”
Section: Differences In Amf Colonization Diversity and Community In contrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although studies had shown that tillage or land-use changes could display negative or no effects on AMF diversity [62][63][64][65][66], AMF diversity in both the rhizosphere soils and roots associated with C. dactylon in this study was significantly higher at CL than at DNC, and then at NCND ( Table 2). Explanations for such different effects could be (1) the host plants that were tested were different, C. dactylon in this study was a flooding-tolerant herbaceous plant with adventitious roots and aerenchyma, as AMF diversity was affected by the host plant identity [60,61]; (2) the land-use intensity was different, as the AMF diversity was affected by land-use intensity [67].…”
Section: Differences In Amf Colonization Diversity and Community In contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Besides, nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analyses indicated that land-use type was also a primary contributor to affect AMF community in the rhizosphere soils of C. dactylon (Figure 4, Table S4). Previous studies have demonstrated that the AMF communities in the sub-Saharan savannas soils of West Africa and temperate climatic zone soils of Central Europe were generally mediated through land-use type or intensity [66,80]. An explanation might be that land-use type could alter soil abiotic properties, such as soil available phosphorus and C/N ratio, thus influencing the AMF community in the rhizosphere soils.…”
Section: Correlations Of Differences Between Amf Community and Relevamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genera have always been referred to as the most representative in diverse environments in Brazil (e.g. Aidar et al, 2004;Covacevich and Berbara, 2011;de Carvalho et al, 2012;Maia et al, 2010;Moreira et al, 2007;Silva et al, 2012;Souza et al, 2013;Stürmer et al, 2006) and elsewhere (Jefwa et al, 2012;Kowalczyk and Błaskowski, 2011;Li et al, 2007;Oehl et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The orders of Diversisporales and Glomerales were the most abundant and were present in all sites. Generally, species of Acaulospora and Glomus are more common in both natural and managed environments (Aidar et al 2004;Jefwa et al 2012;Oehl et al 2003). This result is due to both the high number of described species in these genera as well as their spread and adaptability (Daniell et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%