2003
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2003.819494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of intraband relaxation on the performance of a quantum-dot laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
89
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
89
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…13 The interlevel relaxation time 0 was fixed to 7 ps as previously determined from fitting of LI characteristics of single-section lasers. 6,7 This is close to values determined by other techniques [14][15][16] and predicted by theory. 17 The capture time c , whose value was checked not to play an important role, was fixed to 10 ps.…”
Section: Results and Calculationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 The interlevel relaxation time 0 was fixed to 7 ps as previously determined from fitting of LI characteristics of single-section lasers. 6,7 This is close to values determined by other techniques [14][15][16] and predicted by theory. 17 The capture time c , whose value was checked not to play an important role, was fixed to 10 ps.…”
Section: Results and Calculationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ridge-waveguide ͑ridge width= 4 m͒ edge-emitting lasers have been fabricated from this structure with as cleaved facets, as already reported. 6,7 These devices operate on the GS transition at 1.28 m for a cavity length l Ͼ 2.5 mm and on the ES transition at 1.22 m for a cavity length l Ͻ 1.5 mm. For an intermediate cavity length of 1.5 mmϽ l Ͻ 2.5 mm lasing takes place on both GS and ES transitions due to a combination of GS gain saturation and a slow intraband relaxation time.…”
Section: Results and Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stacking more QD layers into the active region should result in higher modal gain, allowing laser emission from shorter cavities compatible with 10 Gb/s direct modulation. As the K-factor is about 2 times lower than that of standard InAs/GaAs QD layer structures 21 lower than that of InAs/GaAs QDs lasers, where strong damping was attributed to carrier relaxation from the ES to the GS (so-called phonon relaxation bottleneck 20 ). Surprisingly, the peak of the relaxation oscillation is clearly distinguishable in the modulation transfer function of the InAs/InP (311)B QD lasers (inset Fig.4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Reduced non linear gain compression and the absence of ES emission at high injection current in InAs/InP (311)B QD lasers result in a smaller rate of decrease of the differential gain with the current density compared to 5-InAs/GaAs QD layer structures 18 . This explains why no divergence of the Henry factor is observed at high injection current, unlike InAs/GaAs QD lasers where it was attributed to incomplete gain clamping of the ES at the GS threshold gain 20 . The LEF was also measured on two other longitudinal modes at 1517 and 1527 nm (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%