2023
DOI: 10.4285/kjt.23.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of institutional case volume of solid organ transplantation on patient outcomes and implications for healthcare policy in Korea

Abstract: Solid organ transplantation is distinguished from other high-risk surgical procedures by the fact that it utilizes an extremely limited and precious resource and requires a multidisciplinary team approach. For several decades, institutional experience, as quantified by center volume, has been shown to be strongly associated with patient outcomes and graft survival after solid organ transplantation. The United States has implemented a minimum case volume requirement and performance standards for accreditation a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed center volume effect on specific types of surgeries and patient populations, which demonstrates improved patient mortality, has prompted discussions about whether these procedures should be limited to high-volume centers with favorable outcomes [ 41 , 42 ]. The significant volume effect on mortality in solid organ transplantation and trauma centers has led to policy changes requiring minimum case volumes for center accreditation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed center volume effect on specific types of surgeries and patient populations, which demonstrates improved patient mortality, has prompted discussions about whether these procedures should be limited to high-volume centers with favorable outcomes [ 41 , 42 ]. The significant volume effect on mortality in solid organ transplantation and trauma centers has led to policy changes requiring minimum case volumes for center accreditation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%