2018
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-17-0816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Frailty Markers for Unplanned Hospital Readmission Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is only natural that recent past history is a powerful predictor for readmission in this population. Besides this, the next more relevant variable is the Fried aggregate frailty index, which is in agreement with recent literature where frailty has been found to predict hospital readmission and mortality in patients with heart failure (Rampersad et al, ), after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Saji et al, ), with chronic obtrusive pulmonary disease (Bernabeu‐Mora et al, ), and in hip and knee arthroplasty (Shin et al, ; Traven et al, ). However, the definition of frailty indices are still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is only natural that recent past history is a powerful predictor for readmission in this population. Besides this, the next more relevant variable is the Fried aggregate frailty index, which is in agreement with recent literature where frailty has been found to predict hospital readmission and mortality in patients with heart failure (Rampersad et al, ), after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Saji et al, ), with chronic obtrusive pulmonary disease (Bernabeu‐Mora et al, ), and in hip and knee arthroplasty (Shin et al, ; Traven et al, ). However, the definition of frailty indices are still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Saji et al, 2018), with chronic obtrusive pulmonary disease (Bernabeu-Mora et al, 2017), and in hip and knee arthroplasty (Shin et al, 2016;Traven et al, 2019). However, the definition of frailty indices are still a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, used methods were subjective and based on qualitative manner and could not precisely evaluate cognitive function and level of independence. Enhanced FFS (or 7-item expanded CHS) with additional testing of cognitive function (using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)) and depressed mood was implemented [ 24 , 27 ]. Another example of FFS modification (modified fried frailty criteria) was scale for frailty evaluation that includes similar domains by using different methods to describe malnutrition (hypoalbuminemia) and clearly describe level of independence with Katz index [ 13 , 28 30 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the requirements for frailty assessment (especially for screening) is simplicity and ability to assess frailty in a very short period of time. One of the most evaluated frailty assessments is the 5-meter (15 feet ~ 4,5 meters) walking test which can be used as part of other scales (FFS) or as stand-alone evaluation [ 13 , 20 , 24 , 27 , 30 , 47 , 49 51 ]. This test results could be evaluated in different manner: (1) measuring time taken for 5-meter walk in seconds and (2) measuring gait speed in meters per second.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,7,17 In the present study, BMI and low serum albumin level were identified as independent predictors of death, whereas the clinical frailty scale was not, probably because of its subjective parameters. 19,20 To enable accurate general use of any disease-specific predictive model, it is necessary to include objective parameters or information that is easy to obtain to minimize the inter-or intravariability. 18,21 Although the STS score consists of well-defined parameters, as with the SYNTAX score, its larger number of parameters than needed for the TAVR risk score may result in greater interobserver variability.…”
Section: Incremental Value Of the Tavr Risk Score With Af Bmi And Smentioning
confidence: 99%