2015
DOI: 10.1177/0015732515589442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: There is no clear-cut evidence whether fiscal incentives turn into desired growth of the economy or just result in cost for the exchequer. Looking at the success of China and other countries, India has tried to replicate the ‘zone’ concept by enacting special economic zones (SEZs) policy in 2005. The present article attempts to study different types of fiscal incentives given to the firms in SEZs and their impact on the performance through survey-cum-interview method. The research reveals that there is a need … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding requirement and importance of different incentives; 118 respondents clearly indicated their choice for direct incentives while 61 and 27 respondents preferred both direct and indirect incentives, respectively. Thus, preference for the incentives suggested by MSMEs confirms with the findings of Anke (2003), Jani et al (2015), and Pandya and Joshi (2015), while it contradicts with Rondinelli and Burpitt (2000) and IFC Team (2008). Similarly, factor analysis carried out on direct and indirect incentives further indicated that respondents prefer right blend of direct and indirect incentives as Factor 1 was composed of all indirect incentives; while Factors 2, 3, and 4 showed family of various direct and indirect incentive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding requirement and importance of different incentives; 118 respondents clearly indicated their choice for direct incentives while 61 and 27 respondents preferred both direct and indirect incentives, respectively. Thus, preference for the incentives suggested by MSMEs confirms with the findings of Anke (2003), Jani et al (2015), and Pandya and Joshi (2015), while it contradicts with Rondinelli and Burpitt (2000) and IFC Team (2008). Similarly, factor analysis carried out on direct and indirect incentives further indicated that respondents prefer right blend of direct and indirect incentives as Factor 1 was composed of all indirect incentives; while Factors 2, 3, and 4 showed family of various direct and indirect incentive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Looking at the success of China and other countries, India has attempted to replicate the zone concept by enacting SEZs policy in 2005. In that regard, the survey cum interview method adopted by Pandya and Joshi (2015) revealed that respondents really value concrete direct incentives along with other basic benefits and not a range of miscellaneous incentives. This also confirms with the findings of Jani et al (2015), Yusuph and O Youze (2014), and IFC Team (2008) while research by Ramarao (2012) and Pal (2013) emphasized more on other basic benefits given to MSMEs.…”
Section: Introduction and Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%