2018
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Impact of Duration of Neoadjuvant Radiation on Rectal Cancer Survival: A Real World Multi-center Retrospective Cohort Study
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
4
3
1
1
Citation Types
2
10
0
0
Year Published
Range
2018
20182023
2023Publication Types
Select...
7
1
Relationship
2
6
Authors
Journals
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
References 29 publications
2
10
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with SCRT rather than LCRT were older, had more medical comorbidities, and tended to have earlier stage disease or more favorable disease. This is in line with previous retrospective studies, 16 and may be due to the logistical convenience of SCRT compared with LCRT among groups of patients with compromised general conditions.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with SCRT rather than LCRT were older, had more medical comorbidities, and tended to have earlier stage disease or more favorable disease. This is in line with previous retrospective studies, 16 and may be due to the logistical convenience of SCRT compared with LCRT among groups of patients with compromised general conditions.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In our study, clinical node positivity was an independent predictor for receiving LCR over SCR. This is in line with findings of a recent cohort study that demonstrated that patients staged as N1 or N2 were more likely to receive LCR over SCR (OR 5.08, CI 2.51–11.22, P < 0.0001 and OR 8.35, CI 3.35–22.39, P < 0.001, respectively) . However, almost a third of presumed node‐positive patients in our cohort who received neoadjuvant therapy, had SCR rather than LCR, suggesting that it is not the only factor driving decision‐making.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 217 studies were excluded and 21 studies were subjected to a more detailed review. Finally, 11 studies (4 RCTs [ 10 , 13 – 15 ] and 7 non-RCTs [ 28 – 34 ]) with a total of 1984 patients were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 included studies all analyzed OS and DFS, and 10 of them analyzed LR. 4 RCTs [ 10 , 13 – 15 ] out of the 11 studies earned scores of 6 for quality assessment based on the modified Jadad scale, and the 7 non-RCTs [ 28 – 34 ] were scored 4.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with SCRT rather than LCRT were older, had more medical comorbidities, and tended to have earlier stage disease or more favorable disease. This is in line with previous retrospective studies, 16 and may be due to the logistical convenience of SCRT compared with LCRT among groups of patients with compromised general conditions.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In our study, clinical node positivity was an independent predictor for receiving LCR over SCR. This is in line with findings of a recent cohort study that demonstrated that patients staged as N1 or N2 were more likely to receive LCR over SCR (OR 5.08, CI 2.51–11.22, P < 0.0001 and OR 8.35, CI 3.35–22.39, P < 0.001, respectively) . However, almost a third of presumed node‐positive patients in our cohort who received neoadjuvant therapy, had SCR rather than LCR, suggesting that it is not the only factor driving decision‐making.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 217 studies were excluded and 21 studies were subjected to a more detailed review. Finally, 11 studies (4 RCTs [ 10 , 13 – 15 ] and 7 non-RCTs [ 28 – 34 ]) with a total of 1984 patients were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 included studies all analyzed OS and DFS, and 10 of them analyzed LR. 4 RCTs [ 10 , 13 – 15 ] out of the 11 studies earned scores of 6 for quality assessment based on the modified Jadad scale, and the 7 non-RCTs [ 28 – 34 ] were scored 4.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Utilization of short-course radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma in the United States
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Self Cite
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Patients who received neoadjuvant treatment with SCRT rather than LCRT were older, had more medical comorbidities, and tended to have earlier stage disease or more favorable disease. This is in line with previous retrospective studies, 16 and may be due to the logistical convenience of SCRT compared with LCRT among groups of patients with compromised general conditions.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In our study, clinical node positivity was an independent predictor for receiving LCR over SCR. This is in line with findings of a recent cohort study that demonstrated that patients staged as N1 or N2 were more likely to receive LCR over SCR (OR 5.08, CI 2.51–11.22, P < 0.0001 and OR 8.35, CI 3.35–22.39, P < 0.001, respectively) . However, almost a third of presumed node‐positive patients in our cohort who received neoadjuvant therapy, had SCR rather than LCR, suggesting that it is not the only factor driving decision‐making.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 217 studies were excluded and 21 studies were subjected to a more detailed review. Finally, 11 studies (4 RCTs [ 10 , 13 – 15 ] and 7 non-RCTs [ 28 – 34 ]) with a total of 1984 patients were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 included studies all analyzed OS and DFS, and 10 of them analyzed LR. 4 RCTs [ 10 , 13 – 15 ] out of the 11 studies earned scores of 6 for quality assessment based on the modified Jadad scale, and the 7 non-RCTs [ 28 – 34 ] were scored 4.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%