2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of different road types on small mammals in Mt. Kalamaili Nature Reserve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other highly mobile mammals such as squirrels exhibit clear avoidance of roads and rarely cross them [ 63 ]. Road type, size, and traffic volume are all factors that impact animal behavior and perceived risk [ 64 ]. The roads in our study area are hard compact, two-lane roads and are likely a barrier to vole movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other highly mobile mammals such as squirrels exhibit clear avoidance of roads and rarely cross them [ 63 ]. Road type, size, and traffic volume are all factors that impact animal behavior and perceived risk [ 64 ]. The roads in our study area are hard compact, two-lane roads and are likely a barrier to vole movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, this ecological group is recognized by its capacity in influencing ecological processes on different trophic levels, affecting both prey and predator populations (Mortelliti and Boitani 2008). Small mammals have been used to model ecological fluxes in different contexts of human land-uses and applied to achieve different goals, including the assessment of restoration scenarios (McDonald and St. Clair 2004;Rico et al 2009;Hardt et al 2014;Ji et al 2017;Fialho et al 2019;Spirito et al 2020). By compiling data related to small mammals' movement capacity and the Graph Theory, our study provides relevant information to assist landscapes' connectivity recovery, promoting territorial planning towards sustainability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each pair consisted of one (experimental) plot longitudinally bisected by a paved transport infrastructure (hereafter: road), leaving approximately 2.5 × 1.5 km at each side of the putative barrier (hereafter: barrier sides), and another (control) plot that was bisected by an unpaved rural track (T). Rural tracks of 4–6 m wide were used as positive controls of the potential barrier effect of major roads since they were assumed to have much less influence on species movement 28 , 88 and consequently, on gene flow.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%