2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of CT scan in patients with first episode of suspected nephrolithiasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2.6% rate of ''clinically significant pathology'' other than urinary tract stones that we have observed here is significantly lower than the 14.4% 6 and 18% 7 rates reported elsewhere. The higher rates reported in those studies have been used to recommend the routine use of CT for the diagnosis of suspected renal colic; however, their definition of significant pathology appears to include that requiring further workup such as ultrasonography or follow-up CT. We found a similar 13.1% rate of ''significant pathology'' using that definition (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2.6% rate of ''clinically significant pathology'' other than urinary tract stones that we have observed here is significantly lower than the 14.4% 6 and 18% 7 rates reported elsewhere. The higher rates reported in those studies have been used to recommend the routine use of CT for the diagnosis of suspected renal colic; however, their definition of significant pathology appears to include that requiring further workup such as ultrasonography or follow-up CT. We found a similar 13.1% rate of ''significant pathology'' using that definition (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Although a recent review article 4 and summary literature 5 also appear to agree, they do not specify which symptoms and signs can be used for this purpose. These references also highlight some previous literature that appears to show a high rate of significant alternative diagnosis on CT scans ordered for suspected renal colic, [6][7][8] information that clinicians likely use to justify CT scans that might not have been ordered otherwise. We conducted this retrospective observational study of patients who had a renal protocol CT scan to further explore these issues and to see if a similar prospective study was justified.…”
Section: Ré Sumémentioning
confidence: 88%
“…29 However, one small prospective study suggested that CT provided a significant number of diagnoses that could be missed if imaging was not performed. 14 In the present study, there were 47 (5.8%) patients in whom a diagnosis other than ureterolithiasis was made on initial renal US. No serious missed diagnoses were identified within the 90-day follow-up period of the patients with normal results on US, raising the question as to the imperative of performing urgent CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…12,19,20 Ultrasonography is rarely used except in pregnancy and for children. 21 This study found that adverse events were rare when participating EPs felt a CT scan was not clinically indicated among adults ages 18 to 50 years with a first episode of suspected renal colic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%