spending patterns that are needed to spur green, sustainable, and climate-resilient agriculture and contribute to its twin goals of carbon peaking by 2030 and net zero by 2060. The evidence gathered from this study include: (1) the central and local governments have allocated considerable resources over the past two decades to support agricultural and rural development; (2) the composition of public expenditure classified as agriculture, forestry, and water conservancy has changed dramatically in recent years; (3) the public expenditure involving direct support for agriculture peaked in 2015 and has since declined, while public expenditure on general support services has increased and diversified; and (4) the public eco-environmental expenditures have increased considerably and taken on a wide range of different forms.Third, is to facilitate south-south learning by sharing China's experience in formulating and implementing agricultural policies and public spending. The evidence presented in this report shows that China's evolving agricultural and rural development policies and efficient use of public funds have been instrumental in laying the foundations for agricultural productivity growth and, more recently, reducing the sector's environmental footprint. This report concludes that repurposing public policies and producer support or subsidy programs for agriculture is key to China's transition to greener, sustainable, and climate-resilient agrifood systems. The political and economic case for doing this is clear, especially as China seeks to achieve high quality green growth by optimizing its public finances. The report recommends some options for China to consider as it continues to implement policy reforms, which are also relevant to other developing countries: (1) redirect agricultural support tied to specific uses (inputs or practices) or production of specific outputs, to indirect or income support or to promote desirable outcomes (e.g., protecting and restoring critical ecosystems and biodiversity); (2) tie public support to farmers to the reduction of environmental impact and/or to compliance with relevant laws on ecosystem protection and sustainable management; (3) use public funds to double investment in agricultural R&D, extensions and advisory services, and other technical services; (4) avoid linking public support to volume of output, which encourages overproduction, or to area of land owned, which may lead to inequitable or perverse outcomes; and (5) instead, link public funds explicitly to the achievement of positive environmental outcomes, including improving soil health (e.g., soil carbon sequestration, soil organic matter, conservation agriculture, uptake of higher fertilizer), increasing water use efficiency and reducing GHG emissions.We hope that the findings presented in this report will resonate with policymakers concerned with agricultural policies and, more specifically, with public spending programs that aim to improve the productivity of China's agriculture while reducing its environment...