2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a long-term crop-livestock system on the physical and hydraulic properties of an Oxisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a higher bulk density in PA in comparison to NV was observed, this increase did not reflect in alterations in h FC and t FC in the Clayey soil. However, the lower stocking rate during grazing in the Clayey soil when compared to the Sandy soil (Table 2) can be an important aspect [36] that attenuated water dynamic changes in this soil. In addition, it should be noted that excessive soil water retention at higher h in PA can impair grass growth, due to a limited supply of oxygen to plants, since macropores were <0.10 m 3 m −3 , which is considered critical for air fluxes in the soil [37].…”
Section: Land Transition From Native Vegetation To Pasturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a higher bulk density in PA in comparison to NV was observed, this increase did not reflect in alterations in h FC and t FC in the Clayey soil. However, the lower stocking rate during grazing in the Clayey soil when compared to the Sandy soil (Table 2) can be an important aspect [36] that attenuated water dynamic changes in this soil. In addition, it should be noted that excessive soil water retention at higher h in PA can impair grass growth, due to a limited supply of oxygen to plants, since macropores were <0.10 m 3 m −3 , which is considered critical for air fluxes in the soil [37].…”
Section: Land Transition From Native Vegetation To Pasturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, increased soil density and reduced total porosity were observed as a result of grazing one year after the first experiment was established [60] and confirmed seven years later [61] , but these changes were reversed with each soybean cycle. Generally, grazing intensity did not affect these soil attributes, except for one study [67] . In this study, increased soil bulk density and decreased macro porosity and total porosity were detected in the top 5 cm of soil under intense and moderate grazing intensities (10 and 20 cm sward height, respectively) compared to lighter grazing intensities (30 and 40 cm sward height) and the ungrazed treatment.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The development of conservationist systems such as the CLI system increases the soil-water infiltration rates (Bell et al, 2011;Bono et al, 2012;Bonetti, Anghinoni, Gubiani, Cecagno, & Moraes, 2019), verified by the increase in grazing time with the supply and maintenance of crop residues on the soil surface, both for annual crops and pastures (Lanzanova et al, 2007). However, soil water infiltration can decrease depending on the intensity of cattle trampling and grazing management (Tuffour, Bonsu, & Khalid, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, BIR values obtained from water infiltration rate curves in CLI systems have been used to compare other land-use systems (Bono et al, 2012;Sone et al, 2019;Andrade, Ferreira, Ponciano, & Ponciano, 2020). In this context, grazing height is one of the variables experimentally used in CLI systems (Barbosa et al, 2013;Fidalski & Alves, 2015b;Bonetti et al, 2019), which could be used to estimate other variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%