Impact of a Dutch urban regeneration programme on mental health trends: a quasi-experimental study

Abstract

BackgroundThis paper aims to assess the mental health impact of an urban regeneration programme implemented from 2008 onwards in the 40 most deprived districts in the Netherlands. Interventions varied from improvements in the built environment to activities promoting social cohesion.MethodsWe accessed repeated cross-sectional data from the annual Health Interview Survey, for the period 2004–2011 among adults (n target districts=1445, n rest of the Netherlands=44 795). We used multilevel logistic regression models to compare the development of mental health in the target districts with the rest of the Netherlands and with comparably deprived districts. Results were presented as ‘slope estimates’ with corresponding 95% CIs. Finally, we analysed the trends by gender and by the intensity of the programme.ResultsThe trend change in mental health between the intervention and preintervention period was approximately the same in the target districts as in broadly comparably deprived control districts (Δ slope 0.06 (−0.08 to 0.20)). However, among women, a tendency was found towards more positive trend changes in the target districts compared with control districts (Δ slope 0.17 (−0.01 to 0.34)). Those districts that implemented an intensive programme experienced an improvement in mental health, while residents of the comparably deprived control districts experienced a deterioration, resulting in a statistically significantly more positive trend change between the preintervention and intervention period in those target districts (Δ slope 0.19 (0.01 to 0.38)).ConclusionsImplementing an urban regeneration programme with a wide range of intensive interventions may be effective in promoting good mental health. Further research is required to examine which mix of interventions is needed for the programme to be effective.

Prevalence of Psychological Distress in Suriname In Urban and Rural Areas: The Suriname Health Study

“…Both scales are designed to measure levels of negative emotional states experienced in the four weeks prior to the interview and are widely used to screen on psychological distress [19]. The K10 categorizes levels of psychological distress in no [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], mild [20][21][22][23][24], moderate [25][26][27][28][29] and severe . The K6 categorizes Levels psychological distress into no [6][7][8][9][10][11] ,mild -moderate [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and severe [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”

The impact of urban regeneration programmes on health and health-related behaviour: Evaluation of the Dutch District Approach 6.5 years from the start

“…For instance, a tendency towards a more positive trend in mental health in the target districts was found exclusively among female residents and in districts that implemented an intensive regeneration programme [10]. Studies from other countries underwrite the need for subgroup analyses [16–18,21].…”

Evaluation of the health impact of an urban regeneration policy: Neighbourhood Renewal in Northern Ireland

“…The evaluation of GoWell housing regeneration in Glasgow found that reductions in health inequalities were confined to ‘higher investment areas’ 35. Mental health improvements achieved through the Dutch District Approach were limited to districts that implemented more intensive programmes 29. The Well London initiative only found tentative evidence of progress on some health outcomes in ‘higher exposure areas’ 31 36.…”