2021
Abstract: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in men and the third most common cancer in women, worldwide. Globally, there are 1.4 million new cases of colorectal cancer each year and it is responsible for 694 000 deaths annually [1].The patients are commonly found to have anaemia at the time of diagnosis. This can be due to many mechanisms such as bleeding
Help me understand this reportSearch citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
2
Citation Types
0
7
0
Year Published
2021
2022
Publication Types
Select...
3
Relationship
1
2
Authors
Journals
Cited by 4 publications
(68 citation statements)
References 27 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
7
0
“…We read with great interest Moncur et al's [1] recent systematic review investigating the impact and outcomes of postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients. We congratulate the authors on an interesting review of the current literature that clearly establishes a clinical and academic need to ascertain the true effect of postoperative anaemia, given its high prevalence and potential negative effects on patient outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with great interest Moncur et al's [1] recent systematic review investigating the impact and outcomes of postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients. We congratulate the authors on an interesting review of the current literature that clearly establishes a clinical and academic need to ascertain the true effect of postoperative anaemia, given its high prevalence and potential negative effects on patient outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this effect, the impact of postoperative anemia has become increasing appreciated and identified as a potential window for treatment. 16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this effect, the impact of postoperative anemia has become increasing appreciated and identified as a potential window for treatment. 16 Finally, from a methodological perspective, inherent bias in before-and-after studies must be acknowledged. The retrospective identification of subjects is known to introduce selection bias and temporal biases can also occur as treatment practices may change from the retrospective to prospective cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We welcome the interest in our recently published systematic review investigating the impact and outcomes of postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients [1] from Froud et al We are pleased to further the discussion on the risk bias in the systematic review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We welcome the interest in our recently published systematic review investigating the impact and outcomes of postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients [1] from Froud et al We are pleased to further the discussion on the risk bias in the systematic review. We appreciate that Froud et al agrees with the study conclusion that further research is needed to ascertain the true prevalence of postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients, given its potential to have negative impact on clinical and long‐term functional outcome [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
scite is a Brooklyn-based startup that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.